Songwriting: Writing the Music vs Modern Watercolor Techniques
Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.
Coursera · Creative Arts
Songwriting: Writing the Music
Domestika · Creative Arts
Modern Watercolor Techniques
Per-criterion
The course works through the musical half of songwriting in a focused, practical sequence: diatonic chords in a key, borrowed non-diatonic chords, common progressions and their emotional colour, 7th chords and added tensions, then harmonic and melodic rhythm and melodic hooks. Reviewers and Reddit users describe it as a genuinely useful, concrete walk through how harmony and melody carry emotion — "what the main chords are, simple substitutions, how to add colour, and how those decisions impact the emotion and focus of your song." Capped because it is the music-only companion piece: it assumes you bring lyrics and some theory of your own.
Scarlet Keys is a Professor of Songwriting at Berklee, a former Warner Chappell staff writer with a gold record in Sweden and a UK top-ten hit, and the author of The Craft of Songwriting. On the MOOC, learners find her clear and well-organised. The deduction comes from her wider teaching record: her Rate My Professors profile sits around 3.5/5 across 44 ratings and is polarised — many praise her as knowledgeable, accessible and supportive, while a minority feel she "teaches what she knows best" and is less strong outside her own genres. Strong on the MOOC, more divisive live.
Free to audit the full video curriculum; a certificate, graded assignments and peer review require paid enrollment or a Coursera Plus subscription. The Reddit consensus is to do exactly that — audit it free, work the exercises, and skip the certificate gate. For a Berklee-grade course in melody and harmony aimed squarely at songwriters, the free-audit route is very hard to beat on price.
Assignments ask you to apply chords, progressions and harmonic rhythm to your own song ideas and are assessed by peer review behind the upgrade paywall — pedagogically reasonable but operationally the weakest part, the same machinery that draws complaints across Berklee's Coursera catalogue. The bigger applied limitation is the prerequisite: the most-repeated criticism is that the course "will be frustrating for anyone who does not read music," so the hands-on work assumes notation fluency the marketing underplays.
The harmony and melody tools transfer directly to real writing across genres — Reddit users specifically recommend it to people who can write lyrics but freeze up on chords, and report applying progressions, substitutions and harmonic rhythm to their own songs straight away. It will not teach you production, arrangement or an instrument, and it pairs best with a lyrics course, so it is one strong pillar of a songwriting education rather than the whole building.
Thirty-two lessons across three hours and twenty minutes walk beginners through four well-chosen building blocks: basic transparency and gradient exercises, brush pressure and precision drills, monochromatic single-colour illustrations, and a creative experimental section covering planet-forming, jellyfish and galaxy compositions. The logical sequence — foundational exercises first, applied projects second — is the right architecture for a beginner course. The ceiling is depth: the course is firmly introductory, spending around six minutes per lesson on average, and no topic receives enough time to produce confident independent work. The creative experimental section (planets, galaxy) is the highlight of the curriculum but is also the narrowest in scope — learners wanting traditional floral or landscape watercolour will need follow-up courses.
Ana Victoria Calderón is the course's consistent and dominant positive signal. Across every source in our sample she is described as engaging, reassuring, clear and motivating — instructors whose work appears on Hallmark, Papyrus and Trader Joe's products, with degrees in information design and visual arts, and a decade of professional practice. Beginner reviewers in particular praise her explicit reassurance that mistakes are part of the process and her patient step-by-step demonstrations. The Parka Blogs reviewer — an experienced art educator — described the teaching quality as "fantastic" and recommended the course without reservation.
Individual course pricing on Domestika typically sits at $10–$40 on sale (original listed price around $70–$80), with lifetime access, a signed completion certificate and seven downloadable resources included. At $10–$19 during one of Domestika's frequent promotions, three-plus hours of beginner-level instruction with over 229,000 enrolled learners represents strong value. The subscription Plus membership ($20/month or $170/year) adds monthly credits and discounts across the platform. Learners who purchase a single course during a sale get permanent access with no recurring cost, which is a clear advantage over subscription-only platforms.
The course produces five distinct finished pieces across its final project arc: a monochromatic stylised illustration, a set of blended colour planets, a jellyfish drawing and a galaxy composition — plus a series of foundational exercise swatches. The projects are visually appealing, genuinely shareable and well-paced for a first-timer. The limit is genre breadth: all the creative projects sit in an abstract, space-themed aesthetic. Learners who complete the course have a handful of appealing finished pieces and a clear sense of what watercolour can do experimentally, but no portfolio output in traditional watercolour genres. No instructor feedback is provided on submitted work; peer comments on the Domestika projects tab are the only critique channel.
The foundational skills taught — transparency, wet-on-wet blending, gradient washes, brush pressure control, value shifts — are universal watercolour competencies that transfer to any watercolour genre. Learners who complete the course understand how water ratio affects pigment spread, how to layer without muddying, and how to use salt and masking fluid for texture. These are genuine, transferable skills. The gap is that the experimental-aesthetics focus of the course projects (planets, galaxies) does not directly map to conventional illustrative or fine-art watercolour work. A learner who wants to paint botanical illustrations, landscapes or portraits will have the right foundational vocabulary but will need genre-specific follow-up to apply it.
Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.