Photography Basics and Beyond: From Smartphone to DSLR vs Fundamentals of Music Theory

Across five courses the fundamentals — exposure, the ISO/shutter/aperture triangle, depth of field, composition, light and basic Lightroom — are taught clearly and at a beginner-friendly pace. Glendinning and Sullivan are repeatedly praised for thoroughness. Capped because several reviewers flag the Lightroom and smartphone sections as dated, and courses 3-4 as padded with off-topic chatter.

Professors Peter Glendinning and Mark Sullivan are the most-cited strength in the first four courses — "thorough", "great advice", "easy to follow". The score is held back by a recurring complaint that the instructors are absent from the discussion forums and never personally critique work, most acutely in the capstone where they "make only token appearances".

Free to audit; ~$49/month subscription for graded assignments and the Michigan State certificate, completable in roughly two to three months. Strong value for a university-backed beginner curriculum. Capped because the capstone month adds little new content for the same monthly fee and a minority called the production quality "not worth the price".

Real shooting assignments, a web gallery and a portfolio-building capstone give learners genuine practice and shareable work. But project quality is bottlenecked by peer grading: many reviewers report superficial one-word critiques, plagiarised submissions, bot accounts and slow turnaround, which undermines the feedback loop the projects depend on.

Multiple learners report going from "knowing nothing" to confident shooting, selling prints, or switching toward photography seriously. The exposure and composition fundamentals transfer directly to any camera. Limited by the absence of business-of-photography content and by post-production teaching that lags current Lightroom versions.

Six modules take you from pitches, scales and modes through intervals, clefs, rhythm and form into two full weeks of functional harmony and a harmonic-analysis final. Revised in 2022. Reviewers consistently praise the clarity and the bite-sized video chunks. Capped because the taught material is thin relative to the difficulty of the quizzes in the later weeks.

Five University of Edinburgh academics — Dr Thomas Butler, Dr John Kitchen MBE, Dr Zack Moir and colleagues — deliver genuinely academic, well-paced lectures. The teaching is the most consistently praised element across the corpus. The variety of voices keeps it fresh, though it makes the level of assumed knowledge uneven from week to week.

Free to audit in full; a certificate is ~$49 (or ~£35) and is included in a Coursera Plus subscription with financial aid available. For a six-module university-grade music-theory course with an open-access companion e-book, the free-audit route is hard to beat on price.

Assessment is quiz- and exam-based rather than creative-project-based — weekly graded quizzes plus a harmonic-analysis final. Good for testing recall and analysis, but there is no composition portfolio or peer-reviewed creative artefact. The exams are the most divisive element, with several learners flagging notation and clef demands that exceed the taught content.

The notation, harmony and analysis skills transfer directly to reading scores, arranging, songwriting and further academic study — Edinburgh positions it as a foundation for musicology, composition and performance. Limit is that it is Western-notation theory, not ear training, production or instrument technique, so it is one pillar of musicianship rather than all of it.