Songwriting: Writing the Lyrics vs Fundamentals of Music Theory

Four focused modules move from point of view and song form through prosody (matching lyric to music), rhyme types — perfect, family, assonance and consonance — and rhythm. The object-writing exercise is the standout that Berklee graduates like Gillian Welch credit as the single most valuable thing they took away. Reviewers repeatedly say it taught them more than books or workshops; capped only because it is lyric-focused and assumes you already make music elsewhere.

Pat Pattison is a Berklee professor of 40-plus years, author of Writing Better Lyrics and Songwriting Without Boundaries, and former teacher of John Mayer and Gillian Welch. His Coursera instructor rating is 4.8 from 184 ratings. Learners describe him as a gifted, passionate teacher whose examples make abstract ideas click — the most consistently praised element of the whole course.

Free to audit the full video curriculum; a certificate, graded assignments and peer review require paid enrollment or a Coursera Plus subscription. Reddit's consensus is that the free audit alone delivers most of the value, since you can do the exercises yourself and skip the certificate gate. Hard to beat for a Berklee-grade course.

Assignments are real lyric-writing tasks graded by peer review, which is pedagogically sound but operationally the weakest part. Multiple learners hit an upgrade wall at the first assessment, and the quality of peer feedback swings from genuinely useful to abusive or absent. The exercises themselves are excellent; the grading machinery around them is not.

The tools transfer directly to any genre — songwriters from hip-hop to country report applying object writing, rhyme families and structure to their own work. It will not teach you melody, production or an instrument, so it is one strong piece of a larger toolkit rather than a complete songwriting education.

Six modules take you from pitches, scales and modes through intervals, clefs, rhythm and form into two full weeks of functional harmony and a harmonic-analysis final. Revised in 2022. Reviewers consistently praise the clarity and the bite-sized video chunks. Capped because the taught material is thin relative to the difficulty of the quizzes in the later weeks.

Five University of Edinburgh academics — Dr Thomas Butler, Dr John Kitchen MBE, Dr Zack Moir and colleagues — deliver genuinely academic, well-paced lectures. The teaching is the most consistently praised element across the corpus. The variety of voices keeps it fresh, though it makes the level of assumed knowledge uneven from week to week.

Free to audit in full; a certificate is ~$49 (or ~£35) and is included in a Coursera Plus subscription with financial aid available. For a six-module university-grade music-theory course with an open-access companion e-book, the free-audit route is hard to beat on price.

Assessment is quiz- and exam-based rather than creative-project-based — weekly graded quizzes plus a harmonic-analysis final. Good for testing recall and analysis, but there is no composition portfolio or peer-reviewed creative artefact. The exams are the most divisive element, with several learners flagging notation and clef demands that exceed the taught content.

The notation, harmony and analysis skills transfer directly to reading scores, arranging, songwriting and further academic study — Edinburgh positions it as a foundation for musicology, composition and performance. Limit is that it is Western-notation theory, not ear training, production or instrument technique, so it is one pillar of musicianship rather than all of it.