Songwriting: Writing the Lyrics vs The Art & Science of Drawing / BASIC SKILLS

Four focused modules move from point of view and song form through prosody (matching lyric to music), rhyme types — perfect, family, assonance and consonance — and rhythm. The object-writing exercise is the standout that Berklee graduates like Gillian Welch credit as the single most valuable thing they took away. Reviewers repeatedly say it taught them more than books or workshops; capped only because it is lyric-focused and assumes you already make music elsewhere.

Pat Pattison is a Berklee professor of 40-plus years, author of Writing Better Lyrics and Songwriting Without Boundaries, and former teacher of John Mayer and Gillian Welch. His Coursera instructor rating is 4.8 from 184 ratings. Learners describe him as a gifted, passionate teacher whose examples make abstract ideas click — the most consistently praised element of the whole course.

Free to audit the full video curriculum; a certificate, graded assignments and peer review require paid enrollment or a Coursera Plus subscription. Reddit's consensus is that the free audit alone delivers most of the value, since you can do the exercises yourself and skip the certificate gate. Hard to beat for a Berklee-grade course.

Assignments are real lyric-writing tasks graded by peer review, which is pedagogically sound but operationally the weakest part. Multiple learners hit an upgrade wall at the first assessment, and the quality of peer feedback swings from genuinely useful to abusive or absent. The exercises themselves are excellent; the grading machinery around them is not.

The tools transfer directly to any genre — songwriters from hip-hop to country report applying object writing, rhyme families and structure to their own work. It will not teach you melody, production or an instrument, so it is one strong piece of a larger toolkit rather than a complete songwriting education.

Seventeen video lessons across four hours and eighteen minutes deliver a carefully sequenced beginner drawing curriculum organised around a single governing insight: every object can be broken down into basic shapes before detailed mark-making begins. The course covers pencil grip and mark-making fundamentals, the observational mindset required to analyse any subject, construction drawing using light foundational lines, basic shape vocabulary, adding detail and texture, and the transition from gesture to finished study. The logic is sound — shape decomposition before rendering is the same approach taught in traditional academic atelier programs — and the daily one-lesson structure lends itself to practice-oriented learning rather than passive consumption. The ceiling is scope. This is explicitly the first module in a seven-part series; learners wanting perspective, shading, contour, or proportion must purchase additional paid courses in the Art & Science of Drawing sequence. The module organisation on Udemy has also drawn occasional criticism from learners who find the lesson ordering within sections less intuitive than the overall arc. That said, the content inside each lesson is praised across all sources for its clarity — one reviewer described it as offering "some of the clearest, most accessible drawing instruction available," a claim consistent with the 4.7 / 5 rating across 15,233 Udemy ratings.

Brent Eviston is the course's dominant strength. He has been teaching drawing for over twenty-five years at studios, museums, galleries, and schools across the United States, was named one of Udemy's Best New Instructors in 2017, and has published two books — The Art and Science of Drawing and The Art and Science of Figure Drawing — available internationally. His courses have reached students in more than 170 countries, and his instructor rating across Udemy sits at 4.7 from 33,107 reviews. Across every source in our sample, students describe him using a tight cluster of vocabulary: clear, concise, encouraging, methodical. He speaks slowly enough to follow even while drawing along, demonstrates arm and hand movement in a way students cite as genuinely illuminating, and frames the course explicitly around the idea that drawing is a learnable skill rather than an innate talent — a perspective that consistently emerges in beginner testimonials as the thing that kept them engaged. CourseDuck reviewers noted his physical demonstrations as a specific standout: "He speaks very clearly and concisely. Love to watch his arm movements and smooth drawing skills." The only credible criticism of his instruction across our sample is a preference disagreement — some learners find the overhand pencil grip he favours uncomfortable — not a flaw in delivery.

The listed price on Udemy is $74.99, but the practical purchase price is consistently $11.99–$16.99 during Udemy's frequent sales — which occur multiple times per month. At that sale price, four hours and eighteen minutes of structured beginner instruction from an experienced teacher with a 4.7 platform rating represents strong value. Lifetime access is included with purchase, and the course carries a Udemy 30-day money-back guarantee. The value question is complicated by the series structure. The Art & Science of Drawing Basic Skills is module one of seven; learners who want to progress to dynamic mark-making, form and space, measuring and proportion, contour, and shading need to purchase the follow-on courses separately. Buying all seven at sale prices totals considerably more than a single course purchase. Learners who want a complete drawing curriculum in one purchase may find Skillshare or a single multi-module Udemy course better value. For learners who want to test a systematic drawing approach before committing to a full series, the $12–$17 entry point is low enough to be low-risk.

The course produces practical drawing exercises rather than polished finished portfolio pieces — its output is foundational skill-building and demonstrable observational improvement rather than visually striking artwork. Students who complete the course can expect to have practised: shape decomposition studies of multiple subjects, light-line foundation sketches, basic contour and texture exercises, and the early stages of subject-specific construction drawings. The learner testimonials are consistent on this point: improvement is visible and measurable within the course's timeline. "I am amazed how much I improved in just one week," wrote one CourseDuck reviewer. Another noted completing "several recognizable pieces" despite never having drawn before. The project output is not glamorous — these are study drawings, not gallery submissions — but for a first drawing course the evidence suggests the exercises actually produce the foundational competence they promise. The limitation is that the portfolio work requires subsequent modules to reach a level of finish that most learners would call a complete drawing. Basic Skills is, accurately, a skills-building module rather than a portfolio-building one.

Shape decomposition as a drawing strategy is one of the most transferable foundational skills in visual art. Learning to see any complex object as an arrangement of basic geometric forms applies to product illustration, botanical drawing, architectural sketching, fashion illustration, and character design equally — it is the underlying grammar of representational drawing regardless of medium. Students who internalise this approach report being able to approach subjects they previously found impossible to start. The real-world ceiling of this specific module is that it stops at the foundation. Basic observational skills, shape vocabulary, light lines and the beginnings of detail are not enough to produce client-ready illustration work without significant additional study. However, the drawing community consensus — visible across Learnopoly's course rankings, Top5Reviewed's analysis, and the instructor's own student testimonials — is that Eviston's systematic approach gives learners the conceptual framework that self-directed YouTube practice cannot, and that the framework transfers immediately to independent practice outside the course. Several reviewers specifically contrasted the course favourably with scattered YouTube tutorials, noting the structured progression builds usable skills rather than isolated technique demonstrations.