CourseVerdict

Creative Writing Specialization vs Photography Basics and Beyond: From Smartphone to DSLR

Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.

Coursera (Wesleyan University) · Creative Arts

Creative Writing Specialization

3.9/ 5 · 47 opinions
30 positive10 neutral7 negative/ 47 total

Coursera · Creative Arts

Photography Basics and Beyond: From Smartphone to DSLR

4.0/ 5 · 48 opinions
35 positive8 neutral5 negative/ 48 total

Per-criterion

Content quality4.2 / 5

Four courses covering plot, character, setting/description and style — each four weeks, each taught by a different Wesleyan author with a National Book Award or PEN nomination — plus a capstone project that produces a completed short story or narrative essay. The breadth is real and the Craft of Style course is singled out across the corpus as genuinely stretching. Capped because the material is pitched at beginners; those who have already read Bird by Bird, On Writing or The Elements of Fiction will find little new ground.

Instructor4.3 / 5

Brando Skyhorse (PEN/Hemingway Award), Amity Gaige (Folio Prize shortlist), Salvatore Scibona (National Book Award finalist, Guggenheim fellow) and Amy Bloom (two-time National Book Award nominee) are a genuinely extraordinary teaching roster for a free- to-audit MOOC. Scibona's Craft of Style and Skyhorse's Craft of Plot are the most consistently praised. Amy Bloom's Craft of Character is the one course multiple reviewers describe as abstract and under-delivering on its promise.

Value for money3.7 / 5

Video lectures are free to audit; all graded writing assignments and peer feedback — the core learning mechanism — require either a Coursera Plus subscription (~$59/month) or financial aid. The financial-aid route is available and has been reported to cover costs fully. For learners who pay full price for the specialization, the credential does not carry formal creative-writing weight, which reduces the return. Value is highest for learners on financial aid who complete all five courses.

Portfolio output3.2 / 5

Each of the four craft courses has a weekly writing assignment with strict word limits — the single most praised pedagogical feature. However, assessment is entirely peer-to-peer: your work is reviewed by three other learners, and you review three peers' work. Multiple reviewers report that most peer feedback amounts to one or two words ("good," "nice") with no substantive critique. The capstone produces a real completed piece, but without instructor-led critique it can arrive unpolished.

Real-world use4.1 / 5

The forced weekly practice under word-limit constraints is the most transferable skill the specialization builds. Finishing a piece every week — even a short one — is harder than most writers manage outside a structured course, and the constraint-based approach to style and setting is the kind of discipline that carries into real writing practice. Limit is genre: the specialization covers short fiction, narrative essay and memoir only — not poetry, screenwriting or genre fiction — and offers no agent-query, submission or publishing guidance.

Content quality4.4 / 5

Across five courses the fundamentals — exposure, the ISO/shutter/aperture triangle, depth of field, composition, light and basic Lightroom — are taught clearly and at a beginner-friendly pace. Glendinning and Sullivan are repeatedly praised for thoroughness. Capped because several reviewers flag the Lightroom and smartphone sections as dated, and courses 3-4 as padded with off-topic chatter.

Instructor4.3 / 5

Professors Peter Glendinning and Mark Sullivan are the most-cited strength in the first four courses — "thorough", "great advice", "easy to follow". The score is held back by a recurring complaint that the instructors are absent from the discussion forums and never personally critique work, most acutely in the capstone where they "make only token appearances".

Value for money4.0 / 5

Free to audit; ~$49/month subscription for graded assignments and the Michigan State certificate, completable in roughly two to three months. Strong value for a university-backed beginner curriculum. Capped because the capstone month adds little new content for the same monthly fee and a minority called the production quality "not worth the price".

Portfolio output3.6 / 5

Real shooting assignments, a web gallery and a portfolio-building capstone give learners genuine practice and shareable work. But project quality is bottlenecked by peer grading: many reviewers report superficial one-word critiques, plagiarised submissions, bot accounts and slow turnaround, which undermines the feedback loop the projects depend on.

Real-world use4.1 / 5

Multiple learners report going from "knowing nothing" to confident shooting, selling prints, or switching toward photography seriously. The exposure and composition fundamentals transfer directly to any camera. Limited by the absence of business-of-photography content and by post-production teaching that lags current Lightroom versions.

Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.