MITx 6.86x: Machine Learning with Python — From Linear Models to Deep Learning vs Machine Learning Scientist with Python
Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.
MITx / edX · AI & ML Courses
MITx 6.86x: Machine Learning with Python — From Linear Models to Deep Learning
DataCamp · AI & ML Courses
Machine Learning Scientist with Python
Per-criterion
Graduate-level MIT curriculum: linear classifiers, SVMs, neural nets, clustering, recommender systems, and reinforcement learning, taught from first principles. Reviewers praise the depth and the under-the-hood focus, though several find the lectures terse with too few worked examples.
Taught by MIT faculty Regina Barzilay, Tommi Jaakkola, and Karene Chu. Strong expertise, but learner feedback on the lectures is polarized — praised for intuition by some, called short and example-light by others. Most learning happens through the projects, not the videos.
A verified certificate (~$300) buys MIT-grade material that builds algorithms from scratch and counts toward the Statistics and Data Science MicroMasters. The course can also be audited for free, so the paid tier is mainly for the credential and graded autograder access.
As a self-paced MOOC there is no 1:1 instructor support; help comes from course forums and learner-run Discord groups. Multiple reviewers explicitly recommend joining a class Discord to stay motivated and unblock on projects, which signals the official support channel alone is thin.
You implement linear models, kernels, neural nets, and RL by hand, which builds durable intuition for how ML actually works. The trade-off, noted by reviewers, is that it deliberately avoids high-level libraries like scikit-learn, so it is foundational rather than a job-ready tooling course.
Career track is broad and well-sequenced across 23 courses, but reviewers consistently describe the ML chapters as "crash courses" — useful introductions that lack the depth of Coursera, edX or fast.ai.
Individual instructors like Andreas Müller, Allen Downey and Hugo Bowne-Anderson get strong praise, but there is no single pedagogical voice across the 23-course track and reviewers note quality varies course by course.
At roughly $13-16 per month on the annual plan the breadth of access (600+ courses) is hard to beat. Monthly billing at $39 and the year-two renewal price draw consistent complaints.
No live mentorship or cohort Q&A — learners self-direct through hints, AI assistant and community forums. The DataLab AI explainer helps but is not a substitute for human support.
Sandbox environment removes setup friction but does not teach IDEs, virtual environments, git or messy real-world data pipelines. Fill-in-the-blank exercises limit independent problem-solving.
Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.