CourseVerdict

MITx 6.86x: Machine Learning with Python — From Linear Models to Deep Learning vs HarvardX Professional Certificate in Data Science

Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.

MITx / edX · AI & ML Courses

MITx 6.86x: Machine Learning with Python — From Linear Models to Deep Learning

4.2/ 5 · 30 opinions
18 positive7 neutral5 negative/ 30 total

Harvard University (edX, PH125.x series by Rafael Irizarry) · AI & ML Courses

HarvardX Professional Certificate in Data Science

3.8/ 5 · 42 opinions
26 positive9 neutral7 negative/ 42 total

Per-criterion

Content quality4.5 / 5

Graduate-level MIT curriculum: linear classifiers, SVMs, neural nets, clustering, recommender systems, and reinforcement learning, taught from first principles. Reviewers praise the depth and the under-the-hood focus, though several find the lectures terse with too few worked examples.

Instructor3.8 / 5

Taught by MIT faculty Regina Barzilay, Tommi Jaakkola, and Karene Chu. Strong expertise, but learner feedback on the lectures is polarized — praised for intuition by some, called short and example-light by others. Most learning happens through the projects, not the videos.

Value for money4.2 / 5

A verified certificate (~$300) buys MIT-grade material that builds algorithms from scratch and counts toward the Statistics and Data Science MicroMasters. The course can also be audited for free, so the paid tier is mainly for the credential and graded autograder access.

Support3.4 / 5

As a self-paced MOOC there is no 1:1 instructor support; help comes from course forums and learner-run Discord groups. Multiple reviewers explicitly recommend joining a class Discord to stay motivated and unblock on projects, which signals the official support channel alone is thin.

Real-world use4.1 / 5

You implement linear models, kernels, neural nets, and RL by hand, which builds durable intuition for how ML actually works. The trade-off, noted by reviewers, is that it deliberately avoids high-level libraries like scikit-learn, so it is foundational rather than a job-ready tooling course.

Content quality3.6 / 5

Nine-course breadth — R, visualisation, probability, inference, productivity tools, wrangling, linear regression, machine learning, capstone. Reviewers flag the Machine Learning course as poorly scaffolded with sharp difficulty jumps; the capstone is the strongest component.

Instructor3.5 / 5

Rafael Irizarry is a respected biostatistician (Simply Statistics, dsbook) and the content is academically solid. Pedagogically reviewers note examples pitched above true-beginner level and short videos that often defer to outside resources for depth.

Value for money3.9 / 5

One-time $792 for verified certificates across 9 courses (often discounted to ~$441), or free audit for everything except graded assignments and the certificate. Reviewers call paid accountability the main value lever, plus a modest Harvard CV signal.

Support3.1 / 5

Self-paced edX experience — no live TA, no office hours, peer-graded capstone with inconsistent feedback. HN and blog reviewers consistently report supplementing the lectures with DataCamp, YouTube and Stack Overflow rather than course forums.

Real-world use3.3 / 5

Produces a real portfolio artefact (MovieLens recommender plus a self-chosen project) and a working R toolchain — RStudio, tidyverse, git. The honest gap is zero Python and zero SQL coverage; reviewers explicitly recommend pairing it before applying for analyst roles.

Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.