Cert Prep: Project Management Professional (PMP)® vs Nova's LSAT Prep Course

Sandra Mitchell's Cert Prep course covers the full breadth of the PMP Exam Content Outline across a PMI-approved 35-hour curriculum. Reviewers consistently note that the course walks learners methodically through the PMBOK, connecting each knowledge area to exam-relevant scenarios. Mike C. Elliot, a PMP holder who reviewed the course in detail, described being "thoroughly impressed by the quality and challenge of the course," specifically calling out the per-chapter quizzes and the 200-question timed practice exam as standout features. The course includes chapter-level quizzes that allow learners to self-assess comprehension before moving forward, along with a full-length simulated exam that replicates the actual PMP's length and format. Multiple bloggers who passed the PMP on their first attempt listed the course as a core component of their preparation, praising its structured, sequential approach to covering process groups, knowledge areas, and agile/hybrid concepts introduced in the updated exam format. Where the content earns lower marks from some learners is in the density of practice questions relative to dedicated exam simulators. Practitioners who have used platforms like PMTraining or PrepAway alongside the LinkedIn Learning course note that the 200 included questions, while useful, are not sufficient on their own for someone targeting the highest performance bands. The course is therefore best understood as a high-quality conceptual foundation rather than a standalone question-drilling tool.

Sandra Mitchell holds MBA, PMP, ACP, DASM, and CSM credentials and brings extensive real-world project management experience to her instruction. Saad Papa, who passed the PMP on his first attempt, wrote that "Sandra is a highly experienced project manager who does an excellent job of walking you through the PMBOK," crediting her as a key reason for choosing the course over alternatives. Mike C. Elliot echoed this assessment, writing that "Sandy was 'spot-on' with regard to what I experienced, watching her presentation was well worth the time!" His review specifically highlighted how Mitchell's exam-day guidance aligned closely with what candidates actually encounter in the testing centre, a sign that her instruction reflects genuine practitioner insight rather than surface-level content summarisation. Colleagues and collaborators who have worked with Mitchell on LinkedIn Learning course productions describe her as "an amazing partner and an awesome instructor," while veteran PM educator Lee R. Lambert noted that she is "an experienced facilitator of knowledge transfer based on her real world project work." The consistent thread across all sources is that Mitchell communicates complex project management concepts with clarity and practical relevance, which translates well to adult learners preparing for a high-stakes professional exam.

The course is accessible through a LinkedIn Learning subscription, which costs approximately $29–$40 per month depending on plan type. Active duty military personnel and veterans can access it free through LinkedIn Premium Career memberships, making it an especially strong value for that segment. LinkedIn Learning is also widely available through employer and university subscriptions, meaning many learners access the course at no direct personal cost. For those paying out of pocket, the subscription model means the course is effectively free if completed within a single billing cycle. Because the course satisfies the mandatory 35 contact hours required by PMI to sit for the PMP exam, and because PMI exam application fees themselves run several hundred dollars, efficiently fulfilling the prerequisite via LinkedIn Learning represents meaningful cost savings compared to boot camp alternatives that typically charge $1,500–$3,000 for the same contact hours. The main value concern raised by reviewers is that the course does not provide enough practice questions to fully substitute for a dedicated exam simulator. Learners who want to maximise their probability of passing typically spend an additional $50–$150 on question banks such as PrepAway, PMTraining, or the PMI Study Hall, which slightly reduces the overall value advantage of the subscription model.

Sandra Mitchell's practitioner background ensures the course frames PMBOK concepts within recognisable project scenarios rather than purely theoretical definitions. Learners preparing for the current PMP exam—which emphasises agile, hybrid, and situational judgement questions—report that Mitchell's grounding in real project environments helps them interpret scenario-based questions more intuitively on exam day. Multiple PMP passers credit the course with building a mental model of project management that proved directly transferable to their day-to-day work. One reviewer noted that studying with Mitchell's material changed how he thought about stakeholder engagement and risk management in live projects, not just exam scenarios. This dual value—exam preparation and professional development—is frequently cited as a reason to choose the course over purely exam-focused question-drill platforms. The course is approved by PMI as a Registered Education Provider offering and satisfies the 35-hour contact requirement, which carries institutional weight in the project management profession. PDU credits earned through the course count toward ongoing credential maintenance for existing PMP holders, further extending the practical value beyond initial certification candidates.

The course delivers 403 lectures across 8.5 hours, working through fundamental logic principles — contrapositives, if-then chains, pivotal words — drawn from Nova Press's 560-page Master The LSAT book. Amazon reviews of the underlying book highlight thorough coverage of analytical reasoning and a clear step-by-step breakdown of argument structure. The critical content issue that every independent reviewer and community discussion now flags is currency: Logic Games (the Analytical Reasoning section) were permanently removed from the LSAT beginning August 2024, and any course built substantially around that section is teaching material no longer on the test. The Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension coverage is more durable, but the absence of an explicit update addressing the format change is a real gap.

Jeff Kolby of Nova Press carries genuine credentials — 20+ years in test preparation, millions of students reached through Nova's print materials, and a bestselling Amazon ranking for the Master The LSAT book. Amazon book reviewers describe the Nova approach as highly analytical and structured, with solid foundations for argument deconstruction. The honest deduction is that Kolby is primarily known as a publisher and author rather than an on-screen LSAT video instructor, and with only 187 Udemy enrolments the teaching format has had limited real-world stress-testing relative to competitors like 7Sage or Blueprint. Community discussions on Reddit do not mention him by name in the way that Blueprint or LSAT Demon instructors are cited.

This is where the course is hardest to argue against. At a typical sale price of $12-20 with lifetime access, it provides the equivalent of a two-month course framework for roughly the cost of a textbook — compared to $699-$1,899 for Blueprint, Princeton Review, or Kaplan. The onlinecoursespro.com review gives it 4.2/5 overall and cites the 30-day money-back guarantee, free course updates, and iOS/Android access as genuine extras at the price. The honest caveat is that the low price also reflects a small enrolled community (187 students) and a curriculum that has not been explicitly updated for the post-August 2024 LSAT format, which is a meaningful real cost in wasted study time if you are sitting the current exam.

The course is built around teaching logic principles through the Nova Press curriculum, not around supplying high-volume practice. There are no embedded full-length LSAT practice tests and no original question bank; Reddit's r/LSAT community consistently warns that effective LSAT prep requires drilling with official LSAC questions from LawHub, and no Udemy course can replicate that. Independent community reviewers note that the most cost-effective practice resource is free — Khan Academy's official LSAC-partnered prep — which raises the bar for what a paid course must add. The practice-materials gap here is the widest of the five criteria.

Nova Press's own marketing claims "your score will improve significantly" if you master the course material, and Amazon reviews of the underlying book include anecdotes of successful law school admission after following the study plan. Community opinion gathered from LSAT forums and Reddit threads is more measured: structured prep courses are broadly credited with 10-15 point improvements versus unguided self-study, but reviewers consistently note those gains require pairing any video course with heavy LawHub official practice. At a competitive level, LSAT Demon, 7Sage, and Blueprint are the platforms cited when score improvement is the primary goal.