Figma Essential Training vs UI / UX Design Specialization

The course covers Figma essentials — file setup, frames, shapes, text, images, masks, layers, components, constraints, and a basic interactive prototype — in a logical, tightly paced sequence. The 2025 edition adds a section on Figma AI features, which reviewers welcomed. However, at 1h 37m it is genuinely thin: auto layout, variables, design systems, and developer handoff are absent. Multiple independent reviewers flag it as a starting point that must be supplemented, not a complete Figma education.

Garrick Chow spent over 15 years as a Senior Staff Instructor at LinkedIn Learning (formerly Lynda.com), authoring more than 200 video-based courses covering Adobe Creative Cloud, productivity tools, and design workflows. Learners across platform reviews consistently describe the teaching style as clear, demo-driven, and accessible without oversimplifying. The course's 4.7-out-of-5 star rating across nearly 7,000 learner ratings is a strong signal of execution quality at the instructor level.

LinkedIn Learning costs $29.99/month or $239.88/year (effective $19.99/month annually) as a standalone subscription; it is also included in LinkedIn Premium Career ($29.99/month) and available free via many public library cards. For learners who already have a LinkedIn Premium subscription, the course is essentially free and excellent value. For learners paying the standalone fee just for this course, the value is weak — 1h 37m of content at $29.99 for a single month is expensive per learning-hour compared to an equivalent Udemy course. The subscription unlocks 20,000+ other courses, which changes the equation significantly for prolific learners.

The course builds toward a functional multi-screen prototype using a restaurant app scenario, with one exercise file provided. Reviewers appreciated leaving the course with a completed mini-project. However, the exercise is instructor-led and offers limited creative latitude — learners replicate the instructor's screens rather than designing their own concept. For portfolio purposes, the output requires significant additional work to be genuinely presentable.

The skills taught — frames, components, constraints, basic prototyping — are genuinely foundational and immediately transferable to real Figma workflows. Reviewers confirm that even the older 2021 version's workflow concepts remain valid today because Figma's underlying design model has not changed. The main gap is that workplace Figma usage involves auto layout, design tokens, branching, and dev mode handoff, none of which the course covers.

Visual-design-first curriculum with strong typography, colour and hierarchy coverage. Reviewers consistently flag it as a beginner survey — light on modern UX research, no front-end code, and several call the visual aesthetic dated.

Michael Worthington and Roman Jaster deliver calm, well-paced art-school lectures praised across our sample. The structural catch is that there is no instructor feedback on your work — every assignment is graded by other beginners.

At ~$49/month with a stated 2-month path (most finish in 3-4), all-in cost lands around $100-200 — one of the cheapest paid UX paths and dramatically below mentored bootcamps like Designlab or CareerFoundry.

Two end-to-end portfolio artefacts (a mobile interface and a responsive web project) are real and shareable. The ceiling is capped by peer-only grading and brief plagiarism complaints — reviewers report projects stolen and graded by people who don't know the field.

Gives you the vocabulary and the visual instincts of an art-school designer. Real-world job translation is the weakest area — a 2019 Hacker News post documents a graduate building a CalArts portfolio for two years and still being rejected as 'too junior'.