Figma Essential Training vs Introduction to User Experience Design

The course covers Figma essentials — file setup, frames, shapes, text, images, masks, layers, components, constraints, and a basic interactive prototype — in a logical, tightly paced sequence. The 2025 edition adds a section on Figma AI features, which reviewers welcomed. However, at 1h 37m it is genuinely thin: auto layout, variables, design systems, and developer handoff are absent. Multiple independent reviewers flag it as a starting point that must be supplemented, not a complete Figma education.

Garrick Chow spent over 15 years as a Senior Staff Instructor at LinkedIn Learning (formerly Lynda.com), authoring more than 200 video-based courses covering Adobe Creative Cloud, productivity tools, and design workflows. Learners across platform reviews consistently describe the teaching style as clear, demo-driven, and accessible without oversimplifying. The course's 4.7-out-of-5 star rating across nearly 7,000 learner ratings is a strong signal of execution quality at the instructor level.

LinkedIn Learning costs $29.99/month or $239.88/year (effective $19.99/month annually) as a standalone subscription; it is also included in LinkedIn Premium Career ($29.99/month) and available free via many public library cards. For learners who already have a LinkedIn Premium subscription, the course is essentially free and excellent value. For learners paying the standalone fee just for this course, the value is weak — 1h 37m of content at $29.99 for a single month is expensive per learning-hour compared to an equivalent Udemy course. The subscription unlocks 20,000+ other courses, which changes the equation significantly for prolific learners.

The course builds toward a functional multi-screen prototype using a restaurant app scenario, with one exercise file provided. Reviewers appreciated leaving the course with a completed mini-project. However, the exercise is instructor-led and offers limited creative latitude — learners replicate the instructor's screens rather than designing their own concept. For portfolio purposes, the output requires significant additional work to be genuinely presentable.

The skills taught — frames, components, constraints, basic prototyping — are genuinely foundational and immediately transferable to real Figma workflows. Reviewers confirm that even the older 2021 version's workflow concepts remain valid today because Figma's underlying design model has not changed. The main gap is that workplace Figma usage involves auto layout, design tokens, branching, and dev mode handoff, none of which the course covers.

A clear, well-structured tour of the four-stage UX cycle — requirement gathering, designing alternatives, prototyping and evaluation. Reviewers praise the logical sequencing and how concepts are revised through the course. Capped because the material is openly academic and definitional; multiple learners called it shallow, lecture-heavy and light on current tools and best practices.

Dr. Rosa I. Arriaga (Georgia Tech School of Interactive Computing) is widely called clear, structured and good at simplifying jargon, and the course is built on her graduate HCI class. The split is real, though — a meaningful minority found the talking-head video format clinical, monotonous and hard to stay engaged with.

Free to enrol and audit every lecture; you only pay for the graded quizzes and certificate (roughly $49 per course, or via Coursera Plus at ~$59/month or ~$399/year). For a 6-hour academic introduction with 500,000-plus enrolments, the audit-free on-ramp makes the risk close to zero. Financial aid is available.

This is the weakest dimension. The course is quiz-and-reading based with no substantial hands-on project or portfolio artefact — assessment is mostly multiple-choice, and several learners specifically wanted more case studies and practical examples. You finish understanding the vocabulary, not holding work you can show.

The four-stage process vocabulary and the discovery techniques (observation, surveys, interviews) transfer to real UX thinking, and the course is a credible "is this field for me" filter. But reviewers across the corpus are blunt that it does not make you job-ready, skips modern tooling, and leaves you with terms rather than employable skills.