CourseVerdict

Magoosh GRE Premium Prep vs Magoosh LSAT Prep

Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.

Magoosh · Test Prep

Magoosh GRE Premium Prep

4.2/ 5 · 32 opinions
22 positive5 neutral5 negative/ 32 total

Magoosh · Test Prep

Magoosh LSAT Prep

4.0/ 5 · 26 opinions
17 positive6 neutral3 negative/ 26 total

Per-criterion

Content quality4.1 / 5

Magoosh GRE Premium includes 290+ video lessons spanning Quantitative, Verbal, and Analytical Writing, plus 1,600+ practice questions — 160 of which are licensed directly from ETS, the organization that writes the actual GRE. Test Prep Insight confirms the practice problems are "a close match for the real GRE" and that it would be "hard to decipher real GRE problems from most of Magoosh's mock problems." The primary content criticism, surfaced repeatedly by independent GRE tutor Vince Kotchian and GRE Prep Club forum experts, is that hard-level quant questions sometimes exceed actual GRE difficulty and that the curriculum occasionally presents problems before the relevant video concepts have been taught, creating disorienting gaps for self-directed learners.

Instructor4.2 / 5

The two primary Magoosh GRE instructors — Chris Lele (verbal) and Mike McGarry (quant) — are recognized as experienced educators who break down complex GRE concepts with clarity. Verified student reviews on gre.magoosh.com specifically name both instructors as a reason for the platform's effectiveness. GRE tutor Vince Kotchian, with 15+ years of experience, independently affirms their depth of knowledge and quality of instruction. The consistent criticism across reviewers is delivery format: lessons are PowerPoint-style slides with voiceover rather than an instructor on camera, which multiple reviewers describe as monotonous compared to live-style whiteboard formats used by competitors like Kaplan.

Value for money4.7 / 5

At $149 for one month or $179 for six months, Magoosh GRE Premium is consistently described as "an absolute steal" relative to Kaplan ($599), Princeton Review ($449+), and Manhattan Prep ($599+). Test Prep Insight rates value-for-money among the highest in the GRE prep market and EduReviewer assigns it 4.5/5. The +5 point score improvement guarantee — with a full refund that verified users report actually being honored — adds meaningful risk protection. The 7-day money-back window and 7-day free trial further lower the barrier to entry. For the feature set delivered, the price-to-value ratio is unmatched in the premium self-paced GRE prep category.

Practice quality4.0 / 5

Magoosh GRE Premium includes up to 6 full-length adaptive practice tests and a score predictor that estimates performance within a 5-point range after 50+ questions per section (independently measured at 97–99% accuracy for quant and verbal). Verified student data from gre.magoosh.com shows students achieving 322–335 on the actual GRE after Magoosh preparation. The main limitation is volume: 3–6 full-length tests is significantly fewer than Kaplan's 13 or Manhattan Prep's 13. An additional concern raised by Exam Strategist is that some practice test questions are recycled from the main question bank, reducing simulation freshness. One student in the GRE Prep Club forum also noted that the hard Magoosh quant questions can undermine confidence without accurately reflecting real exam difficulty.

Real-world applicability4.2 / 5

Magoosh GRE Premium translates directly to score improvement for its target audience. The platform's own internal data cites an average improvement of 5–6 combined points, and the +5 point guarantee is backed by a full refund. Verified student reviews document score jumps ranging from +6 to +21 points, with one student improving quant from 137 to 158 in a single month of preparation. GRE tutor Vince Kotchian calibrates the realistic ceiling at a combined score of roughly 320: for students targeting that range or below, Magoosh is genuinely effective. For those targeting 165+ per section, the platform's question difficulty and content depth are insufficient without significant supplementation from official ETS PowerPrep materials and higher-rigor resources.

Content quality3.9 / 5

Magoosh LSAT is built around 80+ video strategy lessons covering Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension, plus 6,000+ official LSAC questions and 1,000+ question explanations delivered through the included LawHub Advantage subscription. The single most important content fact is that it is current: the course was rebuilt for the post-August-2024 LSAT, which removed the Analytical Reasoning ("Logic Games") section and replaced it with a second Logical Reasoning section. That matters because a number of older LSAT courses still teach Logic Games as a scored section, and Magoosh does not. The honest content limit, raised across multiple independent reviews, is depth and method: the lessons are deliberately lean ("strategic overview," "bare bones"), and some users report that a lesson teaches only one way to attack a question type rather than the multiple approaches a top scorer eventually needs.

Instructor3.7 / 5

The on-demand class tier is taught by a 99th-percentile LSAT instructor, and the core video lessons are produced by Magoosh's LSAT content team with email tutor support from experienced instructors. Reviewers credit the teaching as clear, concise, and well-organized — one verified student noted the course "summed up the information well and concisely." The consistent criticism is production and presence: Test Prep Insight describes the videos as "dry" and lacking production value, and the standard Premium plan has no live class or on-camera dynamic instruction. The deduction reflects that the teaching is competent and efficient but not the most engaging, and that the human element in the base plan is limited to asynchronous email support.

Value for money4.5 / 5

At $199 for 12 months (plus a one-time $120 LawHub Advantage fee), Magoosh is consistently named the "best budget option" in LSAT prep — roughly a quarter the price of Kaplan ($899+) or Princeton Review ($1,299+), and a flat-fee alternative to the $69–$99/month subscriptions that 7Sage and LSAT Demon charge (which add up fast over a multi-month prep cycle). The +5 point score guarantee with a money-back option and a 7-day no-commitment trial (20 lessons, 40 official questions) lower the risk further. The honest counterweight is the LawHub fee that several reviews omit from the headline price, and the $499 On-Demand Classes tier, which most reviewers consider far weaker value than the base plan. Even so, for official-question access at this price, the value is genuinely strong.

Practice material4.0 / 5

This is Magoosh LSAT's strongest practical feature: through its LSAC partnership and the bundled LawHub Advantage subscription, students get 6,000+ real, official LSAT questions from retired PrepTests, plus timed full-length practice tests and 1,000+ explanation videos. Using only official LSAC content for practice is exactly what the r/LSAT community recommends — third-party "simulated" LSAT questions are widely distrusted, so a platform that wraps its teaching around real PrepTests sidesteps that problem entirely. The limit is tooling depth around the questions: independent reviews call the platform "bare bones" next to 7Sage's analytics, drilling engine, and 99 practice exams, or LSAT Demon's adaptive question recommendations. The questions are excellent; the surrounding drilling and analytics layer is thinner than the premium competition.

Score improvement3.8 / 5

Magoosh offers a +5 point score-increase guarantee (refund if not met, with conditions), and verified student testimonials on the Magoosh site report gains such as +5 to a 162, +8 to a 173, and one +12-point jump to a 167. Those are real, but modest-to-solid rather than elite: independent comparisons put 7Sage and LSAT Demon users at an average 8–12 point improvement, ahead of budget and traditional options. The honest community read is that Magoosh moves the middle of the curve effectively — it is well suited to students climbing out of the 140s–150s toward the low-to-mid 160s — but that it lacks published large-scale outcome data and that learners targeting 170+ typically need a deeper drilling platform or a tutor on top of it.

Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.