CourseVerdict

Magoosh LSAT Prep vs IELTS Band 7+ Complete Prep Course

Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.

Magoosh · Test Prep

Magoosh LSAT Prep

4.0/ 5 · 26 opinions
17 positive6 neutral3 negative/ 26 total

Keino Campbell (Udemy) · Test Prep

IELTS Band 7+ Complete Prep Course

4.3/ 5 · 32 opinions
22 positive6 neutral4 negative/ 32 total

Per-criterion

Content quality3.9 / 5

Magoosh LSAT is built around 80+ video strategy lessons covering Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension, plus 6,000+ official LSAC questions and 1,000+ question explanations delivered through the included LawHub Advantage subscription. The single most important content fact is that it is current: the course was rebuilt for the post-August-2024 LSAT, which removed the Analytical Reasoning ("Logic Games") section and replaced it with a second Logical Reasoning section. That matters because a number of older LSAT courses still teach Logic Games as a scored section, and Magoosh does not. The honest content limit, raised across multiple independent reviews, is depth and method: the lessons are deliberately lean ("strategic overview," "bare bones"), and some users report that a lesson teaches only one way to attack a question type rather than the multiple approaches a top scorer eventually needs.

Instructor3.7 / 5

The on-demand class tier is taught by a 99th-percentile LSAT instructor, and the core video lessons are produced by Magoosh's LSAT content team with email tutor support from experienced instructors. Reviewers credit the teaching as clear, concise, and well-organized — one verified student noted the course "summed up the information well and concisely." The consistent criticism is production and presence: Test Prep Insight describes the videos as "dry" and lacking production value, and the standard Premium plan has no live class or on-camera dynamic instruction. The deduction reflects that the teaching is competent and efficient but not the most engaging, and that the human element in the base plan is limited to asynchronous email support.

Value for money4.5 / 5

At $199 for 12 months (plus a one-time $120 LawHub Advantage fee), Magoosh is consistently named the "best budget option" in LSAT prep — roughly a quarter the price of Kaplan ($899+) or Princeton Review ($1,299+), and a flat-fee alternative to the $69–$99/month subscriptions that 7Sage and LSAT Demon charge (which add up fast over a multi-month prep cycle). The +5 point score guarantee with a money-back option and a 7-day no-commitment trial (20 lessons, 40 official questions) lower the risk further. The honest counterweight is the LawHub fee that several reviews omit from the headline price, and the $499 On-Demand Classes tier, which most reviewers consider far weaker value than the base plan. Even so, for official-question access at this price, the value is genuinely strong.

Practice material4.0 / 5

This is Magoosh LSAT's strongest practical feature: through its LSAC partnership and the bundled LawHub Advantage subscription, students get 6,000+ real, official LSAT questions from retired PrepTests, plus timed full-length practice tests and 1,000+ explanation videos. Using only official LSAC content for practice is exactly what the r/LSAT community recommends — third-party "simulated" LSAT questions are widely distrusted, so a platform that wraps its teaching around real PrepTests sidesteps that problem entirely. The limit is tooling depth around the questions: independent reviews call the platform "bare bones" next to 7Sage's analytics, drilling engine, and 99 practice exams, or LSAT Demon's adaptive question recommendations. The questions are excellent; the surrounding drilling and analytics layer is thinner than the premium competition.

Score improvement3.8 / 5

Magoosh offers a +5 point score-increase guarantee (refund if not met, with conditions), and verified student testimonials on the Magoosh site report gains such as +5 to a 162, +8 to a 173, and one +12-point jump to a 167. Those are real, but modest-to-solid rather than elite: independent comparisons put 7Sage and LSAT Demon users at an average 8–12 point improvement, ahead of budget and traditional options. The honest community read is that Magoosh moves the middle of the curve effectively — it is well suited to students climbing out of the 140s–150s toward the low-to-mid 160s — but that it lacks published large-scale outcome data and that learners targeting 170+ typically need a deeper drilling platform or a tutor on top of it.

Content quality4.2 / 5

Huge, well-structured library — 30 sections, 400+ lectures, 80-90 hours covering Listening, Reading, Writing and Speaking for both Academic and General Training. Reviewers consistently praise the strategy-first approach and examiner-insight framing; the most common content criticism is that the sheer length can feel padded and that the Writing modules are noticeably deeper than Listening and Reading.

Instructor4.5 / 5

Keino Campbell is the strongest single asset in the package — a Udemy Top 10% instructor and multiple-award winner whose clarity, energy and examiner framing draw near-universal praise across every source we analysed. The free monthly live group classes are a genuine differentiator at this price point.

Value for money4.4 / 5

Frequently on sale around $40 (list ~$150) with lifetime access, captions in 10-14 languages, and free monthly live sessions — exceptionally cheap versus Magoosh, Kaplan or a tutor. The honest catch is that you must buy official Cambridge practice books separately, so the true out-of-pocket cost is a little higher than the headline.

Practice material3.3 / 5

The weakest dimension. The course includes 300+ embedded questions, quizzes and roleplays, but multiple reviewers flag that there are no full-length timed mock tests inside the course and that you are expected to supply your own Cambridge books. Writing and Speaking practice is self-assessed — there is no graded, individualised feedback loop.

Score improvement4.1 / 5

Self-reported band gains are common and specific across reviews (1 to 2 band points, Reading 6 to 8, finally clearing Band 7 in Writing). Because the strategies map directly onto how examiners mark, motivated self-studiers who actually do the external practice tend to report real movement — but the course cannot substitute for the practice volume it does not contain.

Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.