CourseVerdict

Logo Design with Draplin: Secrets of Shape, Type and Colour vs UI / UX Design Specialization

Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.

Skillshare · Design

Logo Design with Draplin: Secrets of Shape, Type and Colour

4.0/ 5 · 42 opinions
30 positive8 neutral4 negative/ 42 total

California Institute of the Arts (Coursera) · Design

UI / UX Design Specialization

3.7/ 5 · 45 opinions
28 positive9 neutral8 negative/ 45 total

Per-criterion

Content quality4.4 / 5

Tight 70-minute walk-through of one logo (a family crest) from research to vector polish. Praised across the corpus for clarity and density of Illustrator tips. Capped because the syllabus is narrow — no full brand-system work, no presentation deck, no client process.

Instructor4.8 / 5

Draplin is the single most-cited reason to take the class. Reviewers converge on the same descriptors — funny, no-nonsense, generous, "honest and electrifying" in Skillshare's own framing. Nine years of consistently positive coverage from HN to Logo Design Love.

Value for money4.5 / 5

Included in the Skillshare subscription (~$14/month after trial). A single 70-minute class is hard to compare to multi-month bootcamps, but for the price the catalogue access alone — five Draplin classes plus thousands of others — makes the value case clear.

Portfolio output4.0 / 5

One end-to-end project — a family crest — produces a shareable portfolio artefact, and the Skillshare projects tab has hundreds of completed submissions to learn from. Capped because peer feedback is minimal and there is only one brief, not a series.

Real-world use4.1 / 5

Illustrator shortcuts (Envelope Distort, Offset Path, "keep it live") and the simplification mindset transfer directly to client work. Limit is scope — the class does not cover briefs, presentations, revisions or brand systems, which a real logo job demands.

Content quality3.7 / 5

Visual-design-first curriculum with strong typography, colour and hierarchy coverage. Reviewers consistently flag it as a beginner survey — light on modern UX research, no front-end code, and several call the visual aesthetic dated.

Instructor3.9 / 5

Michael Worthington and Roman Jaster deliver calm, well-paced art-school lectures praised across our sample. The structural catch is that there is no instructor feedback on your work — every assignment is graded by other beginners.

Value for money4.1 / 5

At ~$49/month with a stated 2-month path (most finish in 3-4), all-in cost lands around $100-200 — one of the cheapest paid UX paths and dramatically below mentored bootcamps like Designlab or CareerFoundry.

Portfolio output3.5 / 5

Two end-to-end portfolio artefacts (a mobile interface and a responsive web project) are real and shareable. The ceiling is capped by peer-only grading and brief plagiarism complaints — reviewers report projects stolen and graded by people who don't know the field.

Real-world use3.2 / 5

Gives you the vocabulary and the visual instincts of an art-school designer. Real-world job translation is the weakest area — a 2019 Hacker News post documents a graduate building a CalArts portfolio for two years and still being rejected as 'too junior'.

Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.