Brand Identity Design vs Fashion as Design
Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.
Skillshare · Design
Brand Identity Design
Coursera · Design
Fashion as Design
Per-criterion
The class covers the full brand identity arc — discovery and strategy, visual identity, logo development, typography and colour selection, and presentation — drawing on Woodard's active practice at Brave the Woods (Disney, Target, Microsoft, Ford). Reviewers highlight the practitioner perspective as what separates it from theory-only courses. Tempered by Skillshare's short-format constraints: concise rather than comprehensive, and advanced learners may find strategic sections surface-level.
Brad Woodard is one of Skillshare's most recognised design instructors, with nearly 100,000 students across his classes (learnopoly.com). Principal designer at Brave the Woods, he has worked with Disney, USPS, Penguin Random House, Uniqlo, Target and Microsoft. Students praise his teaching as 'likeable and engaging,' with a process-first style that makes professional output approachable. He covers material quickly — rewatching sections is often recommended.
Included in a Skillshare Premium subscription (~$14/month), so existing members pay nothing extra. As a standalone justification it is reasonable — one focused class inside a vast library is strong value when you use the rest of the platform, weaker if you subscribe for this title alone. Reviewers with existing subscriptions are uniformly satisfied; those seeking a deep branding programme may need supplementary material.
The class project is a complete brand identity from brief to presentation — a meaningful, portfolio-appropriate deliverable. Woodard's related Skillshare class on colour and texture generated 300+ student submissions, evidencing strong engagement. The limitation is format: a short subscription class cannot replicate the feedback loops of a longer programme, so the project is self-directed rather than coached.
Woodard's background pays off most clearly here. The class teaches the brand identity workflow Brave the Woods actually uses with clients — discovery, strategy, visual identity, and handover — not a simplified academic version. Reviewers of his RetroSupply masterclass describe having 'invaluable' access to 'his process from start to finish.' That practitioner authenticity transfers directly to client and freelance work.
Seven weeks built around 70+ garments — from kente cloth and denim to the little black dress and 3D-printed pieces. Studio visits, designer interviews and historian commentary give it real museum-grade depth. Capped slightly because it is a curated survey, not a comprehensive fashion-history syllabus, and the breadth means some garments get only a few minutes.
Led by MoMA senior curator Paola Antonelli with curators Michelle Millar Fisher, Stephanie Kramer and Anna Burckhardt. Reviewers consistently praise the authority and warmth of the presentation and the access to working designers. The curatorial voice is the single most-cited reason learners rate it highly.
Free to audit in full; the shareable certificate is $49 (or included with Coursera Plus). For genuine MoMA curatorial content with no paywall on the learning itself, the value case is among the strongest we have scored. Only reason it is not a flat 5 is that the certificate adds little career signal for the price.
Assessment is peer-reviewed reflection assignments plus weekly quizzes. Multiple reviewers flag the quizzes as generic and memorisation-based, and peer grading as inconsistent with no professional feedback. There is no portfolio artefact — output is written reflection, which suits the subject but limits the "project" dimension.
Gives learners vocabulary, historical context and a critical lens for thinking about clothing — genuinely useful for fashion students, writers, sustainability-minded shoppers and curious generalists. It does not teach you to design, pattern-cut or sew, so applicability for aspiring makers is limited. Best read as cultural literacy, not vocational training.
Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.