Adobe Photoshop CC – Essentials Training Course vs Fashion as Design
Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.
Udemy · Design
Adobe Photoshop CC – Essentials Training Course
Coursera · Design
Fashion as Design
Per-criterion
Adobe Photoshop CC – Essentials Training Course
28+ hours of video covering selection tools, masking, retouching, compositing, typography, colour adjustments, and web and print workflows — enough breadth to take a true beginner through to confident intermediate work. Updated January 2025 to reflect the current Photoshop CC interface. Capped at 4.6 because a handful of reviewers noted pacing inconsistencies between sections and limited coverage of advanced compositing techniques like frequency separation or channel masking.
Daniel Walter Scott holds both Adobe Certified Instructor (ACI) and Adobe Certified Expert (ACE) credentials and runs Bring Your Own Laptop (BYOL), a dedicated Adobe training platform. Reviewers consistently describe him as enthusiastic, clear, and well-matched in pace to complete beginners. The fractional deduction reflects occasional feedback that the delivery can feel slightly over-cheerful, and that advanced learners find the hand-holding unnecessary.
At Udemy sale prices of $12–15 — which occur several times per month — for 28+ hours of content with lifetime access and future updates, the value proposition is very strong. The ceiling is that the list price is artificially inflated, and a small minority of learners paid nearer the full rate and felt the experience did not match the premium positioning.
Projects span logo design, poster creation, social media graphics, and photo retouching — real-world artefacts rather than contrived exercises. Each project ships with downloadable starter assets. The limitation is Udemy's Q&A-only feedback loop: no peer review and no instructor critique of individual submissions. You produce work but receive no evaluation unless you post in the discussion board and happen to get a response.
Covers the workflows a junior designer or freelancer actually uses: masking, smart objects, retouching, layer styles, and basic compositing. Several learners noted they applied skills from the course in paid client work within weeks. The ceiling: the course stops before advanced techniques like 3D, complex channel masking, and Lightroom integration.
Fashion as Design
Seven weeks built around 70+ garments — from kente cloth and denim to the little black dress and 3D-printed pieces. Studio visits, designer interviews and historian commentary give it real museum-grade depth. Capped slightly because it is a curated survey, not a comprehensive fashion-history syllabus, and the breadth means some garments get only a few minutes.
Led by MoMA senior curator Paola Antonelli with curators Michelle Millar Fisher, Stephanie Kramer and Anna Burckhardt. Reviewers consistently praise the authority and warmth of the presentation and the access to working designers. The curatorial voice is the single most-cited reason learners rate it highly.
Free to audit in full; the shareable certificate is $49 (or included with Coursera Plus). For genuine MoMA curatorial content with no paywall on the learning itself, the value case is among the strongest we have scored. Only reason it is not a flat 5 is that the certificate adds little career signal for the price.
Assessment is peer-reviewed reflection assignments plus weekly quizzes. Multiple reviewers flag the quizzes as generic and memorisation-based, and peer grading as inconsistent with no professional feedback. There is no portfolio artefact — output is written reflection, which suits the subject but limits the "project" dimension.
Gives learners vocabulary, historical context and a critical lens for thinking about clothing — genuinely useful for fashion students, writers, sustainability-minded shoppers and curious generalists. It does not teach you to design, pattern-cut or sew, so applicability for aspiring makers is limited. Best read as cultural literacy, not vocational training.
Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.