Dominate GMAT Verbal - Comprehensive GMAT Verbal Prep Course vs Magoosh LSAT Prep
Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.
Brett Ethridge / Dominate Test Prep (Udemy) · Test Prep
Dominate GMAT Verbal - Comprehensive GMAT Verbal Prep Course
Magoosh · Test Prep
Magoosh LSAT Prep
Per-criterion
The course covers Sentence Correction (the "Big 6" grammar rules), Critical Reasoning, and Reading Comprehension across six-plus hours of instructional video. Learners consistently praise the clarity and structure — one student called the material "simple, straightforward and digestible" and credited Brett's "strategies and approaches for thinking quicker." However, the GMAT Focus Edition launched November 7, 2023 and completely removed Sentence Correction from the test, which was one-third of the classic verbal section. A course that still dedicates substantial runtime to a question type that no longer earns test-takers any points carries a content-currency problem that is structural, not stylistic.
Brett Ethridge is the course's strongest asset. A Duke University graduate and MA holder in International Finance, he has an instructor rating of 4.4 on Udemy across 3,199 reviews and is consistently praised for making complex verbal reasoning intuitive. Students describe him as having "fantastic teaching and amazing subject knowledge" and say the course "gave me tools to be confident with the test." Multiple students report 100–150 point score improvements they credit directly to his methods, and one debrief on GMAT Club singles him out by name: "The thing I enjoyed most about his style of teaching was that it was simple, straightforward and digestible."
At typical Udemy sale pricing (under $20 with lifetime access), Dominate GMAT Verbal is dramatically cheaper than the $147 standalone verbal plan on Brett's own DominateTestPrep.com or any full-platform competitor. Learners from the GMAT Club forum bought both this and a second Udemy verbal course for under $10 combined during a Black Friday sale, with one poster summarising the calculus as "Try it — it's virtually free." The honest offset is the GMAT Focus content problem: you are paying, however little, for a course that devotes significant time to Sentence Correction, a skill the current GMAT no longer tests.
The course includes worksheets for each of the six Sentence Correction grammar categories and reading comprehension and critical reasoning drills — adequate for reinforcement but not a high-volume question bank. Serious GMAT Club users consistently note that GMAC official practice tests are the only questions that truly mirror the adaptive exam, and neither this course nor any Udemy GMAT offering includes official GMAC material. For realistic GMAT Focus practice, learners must separately purchase the official GMAT prep software and question packs, making this course a teaching layer rather than a primary practice engine.
Where the course still lands well is on transferable reasoning skills. Critical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension — the two verbal question types retained in GMAT Focus — are taught rigorously, and multiple students report that Brett's structured approach to dissecting RC passages and CR arguments carried them on exam day. Student Georges Kazan (Quebec) specifically called out "Critical Reasoning tools were incredibly helpful," and another student described the experience as "like being handed a flashlight and a map" for an exam that had previously felt overwhelming. These skills also transfer directly to the verbal sections of the LSAT and GRE.
Magoosh LSAT is built around 80+ video strategy lessons covering Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension, plus 6,000+ official LSAC questions and 1,000+ question explanations delivered through the included LawHub Advantage subscription. The single most important content fact is that it is current: the course was rebuilt for the post-August-2024 LSAT, which removed the Analytical Reasoning ("Logic Games") section and replaced it with a second Logical Reasoning section. That matters because a number of older LSAT courses still teach Logic Games as a scored section, and Magoosh does not. The honest content limit, raised across multiple independent reviews, is depth and method: the lessons are deliberately lean ("strategic overview," "bare bones"), and some users report that a lesson teaches only one way to attack a question type rather than the multiple approaches a top scorer eventually needs.
The on-demand class tier is taught by a 99th-percentile LSAT instructor, and the core video lessons are produced by Magoosh's LSAT content team with email tutor support from experienced instructors. Reviewers credit the teaching as clear, concise, and well-organized — one verified student noted the course "summed up the information well and concisely." The consistent criticism is production and presence: Test Prep Insight describes the videos as "dry" and lacking production value, and the standard Premium plan has no live class or on-camera dynamic instruction. The deduction reflects that the teaching is competent and efficient but not the most engaging, and that the human element in the base plan is limited to asynchronous email support.
At $199 for 12 months (plus a one-time $120 LawHub Advantage fee), Magoosh is consistently named the "best budget option" in LSAT prep — roughly a quarter the price of Kaplan ($899+) or Princeton Review ($1,299+), and a flat-fee alternative to the $69–$99/month subscriptions that 7Sage and LSAT Demon charge (which add up fast over a multi-month prep cycle). The +5 point score guarantee with a money-back option and a 7-day no-commitment trial (20 lessons, 40 official questions) lower the risk further. The honest counterweight is the LawHub fee that several reviews omit from the headline price, and the $499 On-Demand Classes tier, which most reviewers consider far weaker value than the base plan. Even so, for official-question access at this price, the value is genuinely strong.
This is Magoosh LSAT's strongest practical feature: through its LSAC partnership and the bundled LawHub Advantage subscription, students get 6,000+ real, official LSAT questions from retired PrepTests, plus timed full-length practice tests and 1,000+ explanation videos. Using only official LSAC content for practice is exactly what the r/LSAT community recommends — third-party "simulated" LSAT questions are widely distrusted, so a platform that wraps its teaching around real PrepTests sidesteps that problem entirely. The limit is tooling depth around the questions: independent reviews call the platform "bare bones" next to 7Sage's analytics, drilling engine, and 99 practice exams, or LSAT Demon's adaptive question recommendations. The questions are excellent; the surrounding drilling and analytics layer is thinner than the premium competition.
Magoosh offers a +5 point score-increase guarantee (refund if not met, with conditions), and verified student testimonials on the Magoosh site report gains such as +5 to a 162, +8 to a 173, and one +12-point jump to a 167. Those are real, but modest-to-solid rather than elite: independent comparisons put 7Sage and LSAT Demon users at an average 8–12 point improvement, ahead of budget and traditional options. The honest community read is that Magoosh moves the middle of the curve effectively — it is well suited to students climbing out of the 140s–150s toward the low-to-mid 160s — but that it lacks published large-scale outcome data and that learners targeting 170+ typically need a deeper drilling platform or a tutor on top of it.
Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.