TOEFL iBT (26+) Complete Preparation Course vs Magoosh LSAT Prep
Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.
Keino Campbell (Udemy) · Test Prep
TOEFL iBT (26+) Complete Preparation Course
Magoosh · Test Prep
Magoosh LSAT Prep
Per-criterion
A genuinely deep, well-structured library — roughly 50-53 hours of video across Reading, Listening, Speaking and Writing, with 87 downloadable resources, section-by-section strategy breakdowns, and content kept current with the redesigned TOEFL iBT (the Academic Discussion writing task). Reviewers consistently call it "probably the most in-depth course you'll find." The main content caveat is that it assumes intermediate-plus English and is not a beginner English course.
Keino Campbell is the single strongest asset in the package — a Udemy Top 10% Most Engaging Instructor, CELTA-certified ESL specialist, university professor and attorney, with 35,000+ five-star reviews across his TOEFL and IELTS catalogue. Clarity, examiner-awareness and the rare free monthly live group classes draw near-universal praise.
List price around $60-85 but very frequently on sale, with lifetime access, monthly live classes, a certificate and Udemy's 30-day refund. That is a fraction of Magoosh, Kaplan or a tutor. The honest catch is that it leans on standard ETS/official practice rather than bundling its own full-length proprietary mock tests, so serious test-takers buy official material on top.
Strong at the technique level — 30+ assignments, quizzes, and timed Reading/Listening practice that simulates exam pressure — but the most-repeated criticism is that there are no full-length proprietary mock tests created specifically for the course, and the dedicated speaking- practice library is thinner than learners want. Most reviewers recommend pairing it with official ETS TOEFL practice.
Self-reported gains are common and specific across reviews — overall scores up 10-20 points, Reading reaching the 26-27 target band. Because the strategies map onto how the TOEFL is actually scored, motivated self-studiers who do the timed practice tend to report real movement, though reviewers stress success still requires consistent effort.
Magoosh LSAT is built around 80+ video strategy lessons covering Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension, plus 6,000+ official LSAC questions and 1,000+ question explanations delivered through the included LawHub Advantage subscription. The single most important content fact is that it is current: the course was rebuilt for the post-August-2024 LSAT, which removed the Analytical Reasoning ("Logic Games") section and replaced it with a second Logical Reasoning section. That matters because a number of older LSAT courses still teach Logic Games as a scored section, and Magoosh does not. The honest content limit, raised across multiple independent reviews, is depth and method: the lessons are deliberately lean ("strategic overview," "bare bones"), and some users report that a lesson teaches only one way to attack a question type rather than the multiple approaches a top scorer eventually needs.
The on-demand class tier is taught by a 99th-percentile LSAT instructor, and the core video lessons are produced by Magoosh's LSAT content team with email tutor support from experienced instructors. Reviewers credit the teaching as clear, concise, and well-organized — one verified student noted the course "summed up the information well and concisely." The consistent criticism is production and presence: Test Prep Insight describes the videos as "dry" and lacking production value, and the standard Premium plan has no live class or on-camera dynamic instruction. The deduction reflects that the teaching is competent and efficient but not the most engaging, and that the human element in the base plan is limited to asynchronous email support.
At $199 for 12 months (plus a one-time $120 LawHub Advantage fee), Magoosh is consistently named the "best budget option" in LSAT prep — roughly a quarter the price of Kaplan ($899+) or Princeton Review ($1,299+), and a flat-fee alternative to the $69–$99/month subscriptions that 7Sage and LSAT Demon charge (which add up fast over a multi-month prep cycle). The +5 point score guarantee with a money-back option and a 7-day no-commitment trial (20 lessons, 40 official questions) lower the risk further. The honest counterweight is the LawHub fee that several reviews omit from the headline price, and the $499 On-Demand Classes tier, which most reviewers consider far weaker value than the base plan. Even so, for official-question access at this price, the value is genuinely strong.
This is Magoosh LSAT's strongest practical feature: through its LSAC partnership and the bundled LawHub Advantage subscription, students get 6,000+ real, official LSAT questions from retired PrepTests, plus timed full-length practice tests and 1,000+ explanation videos. Using only official LSAC content for practice is exactly what the r/LSAT community recommends — third-party "simulated" LSAT questions are widely distrusted, so a platform that wraps its teaching around real PrepTests sidesteps that problem entirely. The limit is tooling depth around the questions: independent reviews call the platform "bare bones" next to 7Sage's analytics, drilling engine, and 99 practice exams, or LSAT Demon's adaptive question recommendations. The questions are excellent; the surrounding drilling and analytics layer is thinner than the premium competition.
Magoosh offers a +5 point score-increase guarantee (refund if not met, with conditions), and verified student testimonials on the Magoosh site report gains such as +5 to a 162, +8 to a 173, and one +12-point jump to a 167. Those are real, but modest-to-solid rather than elite: independent comparisons put 7Sage and LSAT Demon users at an average 8–12 point improvement, ahead of budget and traditional options. The honest community read is that Magoosh moves the middle of the curve effectively — it is well suited to students climbing out of the 140s–150s toward the low-to-mid 160s — but that it lacks published large-scale outcome data and that learners targeting 170+ typically need a deeper drilling platform or a tutor on top of it.
Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.