Nova's LSAT Prep Course vs CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Complete Course & Practice Exam

The course delivers 403 lectures across 8.5 hours, working through fundamental logic principles — contrapositives, if-then chains, pivotal words — drawn from Nova Press's 560-page Master The LSAT book. Amazon reviews of the underlying book highlight thorough coverage of analytical reasoning and a clear step-by-step breakdown of argument structure. The critical content issue that every independent reviewer and community discussion now flags is currency: Logic Games (the Analytical Reasoning section) were permanently removed from the LSAT beginning August 2024, and any course built substantially around that section is teaching material no longer on the test. The Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension coverage is more durable, but the absence of an explicit update addressing the format change is a real gap.

Jeff Kolby of Nova Press carries genuine credentials — 20+ years in test preparation, millions of students reached through Nova's print materials, and a bestselling Amazon ranking for the Master The LSAT book. Amazon book reviewers describe the Nova approach as highly analytical and structured, with solid foundations for argument deconstruction. The honest deduction is that Kolby is primarily known as a publisher and author rather than an on-screen LSAT video instructor, and with only 187 Udemy enrolments the teaching format has had limited real-world stress-testing relative to competitors like 7Sage or Blueprint. Community discussions on Reddit do not mention him by name in the way that Blueprint or LSAT Demon instructors are cited.

This is where the course is hardest to argue against. At a typical sale price of $12-20 with lifetime access, it provides the equivalent of a two-month course framework for roughly the cost of a textbook — compared to $699-$1,899 for Blueprint, Princeton Review, or Kaplan. The onlinecoursespro.com review gives it 4.2/5 overall and cites the 30-day money-back guarantee, free course updates, and iOS/Android access as genuine extras at the price. The honest caveat is that the low price also reflects a small enrolled community (187 students) and a curriculum that has not been explicitly updated for the post-August 2024 LSAT format, which is a meaningful real cost in wasted study time if you are sitting the current exam.

The course is built around teaching logic principles through the Nova Press curriculum, not around supplying high-volume practice. There are no embedded full-length LSAT practice tests and no original question bank; Reddit's r/LSAT community consistently warns that effective LSAT prep requires drilling with official LSAC questions from LawHub, and no Udemy course can replicate that. Independent community reviewers note that the most cost-effective practice resource is free — Khan Academy's official LSAC-partnered prep — which raises the bar for what a paid course must add. The practice-materials gap here is the widest of the five criteria.

Nova Press's own marketing claims "your score will improve significantly" if you master the course material, and Amazon reviews of the underlying book include anecdotes of successful law school admission after following the study plan. Community opinion gathered from LSAT forums and Reddit threads is more measured: structured prep courses are broadly credited with 10-15 point improvements versus unguided self-study, but reviewers consistently note those gains require pairing any video course with heavy LawHub official practice. At a competitive level, LSAT Demon, 7Sage, and Blueprint are the platforms cited when score improvement is the primary goal.

The course covers all five SY0-701 exam domains across 264 modules and 31 hours of video, spanning General Security Concepts, Threats and Vulnerabilities, Security Architecture, Security Operations, and Security Program Management. Reviewers on OpenCourser and Reddemy consistently praise the structured domain breakdown, acronym walkthroughs, and the alignment with official CompTIA exam objectives. The main content gap flagged by multiple learners is limited hands-on lab simulation — the course is predominantly lecture-based, which can make performance-based question (PBQ) preparation less thorough than the actual exam requires.

Jason Dion brings over 20 years of IT and cybersecurity experience to the course and is consistently described by reviewers as easy to follow, thorough, and amiable. OpenCourser reviewers Victor Cabrales and Mark Guillen both called out his clear explanations and acronym-focused teaching style as the course's standout feature. He holds CompTIA Platinum Partner status, and Dion Training's 4.6+ star network-wide rating across 2 million+ students reinforces his reputation as one of the most reliable certification prep instructors in the field.

The course is almost always available on Udemy for $13–$20 during the platform's frequent sales, a price point that Reddemy commenters repeatedly highlight as exceptional for 31 hours of content plus practice materials. One Reddemy user noted purchasing both the course and the separate practice exam set for approximately $13 each during a sale. At that price, Dion's course delivers one of the lowest cost-per-hour ratios of any paid Security+ preparation resource, with lifetime access and periodic content updates included.

Multiple reviewers who passed SY0-701 on their first attempt credit Dion's course as their primary preparation resource, including John T. (Medium), who passed in under two months with no prior cybersecurity background. The course's exam-focused framing maps tightly to Security+'s five domains and the career skills they represent — threat analysis, security architecture, and incident response. However, the lecture-only format and absence of hands-on labs mean learners entering cybersecurity roles will need additional practical experience beyond what the course alone provides.

Like most Udemy courses, learner support is limited to the platform's Q&A section — there is no live instructor interaction or direct email support. One Reddemy user flagged a structural navigation issue, noting difficulty jumping directly to specific domains without watching the course sequentially. Response times in the Q&A section are generally adequate for a high-enrollment course, but learners who need real-time feedback or personalized guidance will need to seek supplementary communities such as the r/CompTIA subreddit.