Nova's LSAT Prep Course vs PMP Exam Prep Seminar - Complete Exam Coverage with 35 PDUs

The course delivers 403 lectures across 8.5 hours, working through fundamental logic principles — contrapositives, if-then chains, pivotal words — drawn from Nova Press's 560-page Master The LSAT book. Amazon reviews of the underlying book highlight thorough coverage of analytical reasoning and a clear step-by-step breakdown of argument structure. The critical content issue that every independent reviewer and community discussion now flags is currency: Logic Games (the Analytical Reasoning section) were permanently removed from the LSAT beginning August 2024, and any course built substantially around that section is teaching material no longer on the test. The Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension coverage is more durable, but the absence of an explicit update addressing the format change is a real gap.

Jeff Kolby of Nova Press carries genuine credentials — 20+ years in test preparation, millions of students reached through Nova's print materials, and a bestselling Amazon ranking for the Master The LSAT book. Amazon book reviewers describe the Nova approach as highly analytical and structured, with solid foundations for argument deconstruction. The honest deduction is that Kolby is primarily known as a publisher and author rather than an on-screen LSAT video instructor, and with only 187 Udemy enrolments the teaching format has had limited real-world stress-testing relative to competitors like 7Sage or Blueprint. Community discussions on Reddit do not mention him by name in the way that Blueprint or LSAT Demon instructors are cited.

This is where the course is hardest to argue against. At a typical sale price of $12-20 with lifetime access, it provides the equivalent of a two-month course framework for roughly the cost of a textbook — compared to $699-$1,899 for Blueprint, Princeton Review, or Kaplan. The onlinecoursespro.com review gives it 4.2/5 overall and cites the 30-day money-back guarantee, free course updates, and iOS/Android access as genuine extras at the price. The honest caveat is that the low price also reflects a small enrolled community (187 students) and a curriculum that has not been explicitly updated for the post-August 2024 LSAT format, which is a meaningful real cost in wasted study time if you are sitting the current exam.

The course is built around teaching logic principles through the Nova Press curriculum, not around supplying high-volume practice. There are no embedded full-length LSAT practice tests and no original question bank; Reddit's r/LSAT community consistently warns that effective LSAT prep requires drilling with official LSAC questions from LawHub, and no Udemy course can replicate that. Independent community reviewers note that the most cost-effective practice resource is free — Khan Academy's official LSAC-partnered prep — which raises the bar for what a paid course must add. The practice-materials gap here is the widest of the five criteria.

Nova Press's own marketing claims "your score will improve significantly" if you master the course material, and Amazon reviews of the underlying book include anecdotes of successful law school admission after following the study plan. Community opinion gathered from LSAT forums and Reddit threads is more measured: structured prep courses are broadly credited with 10-15 point improvements versus unguided self-study, but reviewers consistently note those gains require pairing any video course with heavy LawHub official practice. At a competitive level, LSAT Demon, 7Sage, and Blueprint are the platforms cited when score improvement is the primary goal.

The course is one of the most complete PMP libraries on Udemy — 290 lectures across roughly 24.5 hours, mapped to the PMBOK Guide and split into the PMI exam's three domains (around 20 hours on ways of working, 9 on business acumen, 6 on power skills). Reviewers praise the depth of the worked case studies, the Earned Value Management and ITTO walkthroughs, and the formula coverage. The recurring content caveat is that some material reads as paraphrasing the PMBOK Guide and that the PMBOK 6-to-7 transition left a few coverage seams.

Joseph Phillips is the strongest part of the package and the reason most reviewers recommend it. A McGraw-Hill/AMA/Dummies Press project-management author with 25+ years of consulting and training experience, certified as PMP, PMI-ACP, ITIL, Project+ and a Certified Technical Trainer, he is repeatedly described as clear, articulate and good at breaking complex PMI concepts into understandable parts. The one consistent knock is that he does not answer messages — there is no real instructor interaction beyond the Udemy Q&A forum.

List price runs higher but the course is almost always on sale around $15-25 with lifetime access, and it delivers a genuine 35-contact-hour certificate that satisfies the mandatory PMI education requirement to sit the PMP exam — something most learners would otherwise pay a bootcamp hundreds or thousands of dollars for. That certificate alone makes it one of the best-value ways to clear the PMP eligibility hurdle, with the honest deduction being that you will likely buy a separate exam simulator for practice volume.

The weakest dimension and the one nearly every critical source flags. The course includes section quizzes, formula quizzes and two full-length 200-question practice exams, which is not nothing, but reviewers agree it is not enough question volume to be exam-ready and recommend buying a dedicated PMP simulator on top. There are also repeated complaints about quiz questions that are not covered in the lectures and a handful of wrong or unrevised answer keys.

The course has hundreds of learners crediting it with passing the PMP exam, often on the first attempt, and several describe a workable plan of pairing each PMBOK chapter with the matching lecture over about a month. The deduction is that almost no one passes on this course alone — the consistent advice across sources is to supplement with a separate question bank or simulator, so score movement depends on the learner adding practice the course does not fully provide.