CourseVerdict

GRE Math Prep Course: The A–Z on GRE Math Topic by Topic vs Magoosh GRE Prep

Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.

Olu Sanya (Udemy) · Test Prep

GRE Math Prep Course: The A–Z on GRE Math Topic by Topic

3.9/ 5 · 28 opinions
19 positive5 neutral4 negative/ 28 total

Magoosh · Test Prep

Magoosh GRE Prep

4.2/ 5 · 34 opinions
23 positive6 neutral5 negative/ 34 total

Per-criterion

Content quality4.3 / 5

The course is a tightly-organised library of 240 worked GRE quant solutions across ~13 hours, taught topic by topic from the absolute basics up through harder material like probability. Reviewers consistently praise the clear, step-by-step breakdowns and the memorable mnemonic devices (the "Beyonce Rule" is the one people quote back). The recurring content caveat is that it is purely solution walkthroughs — there are no embedded original practice questions, so the "content" is teaching, not testing.

Instructor4.4 / 5

Olu Sanya is the strongest part of the package. A Morehouse/Georgia Tech Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering graduate with 14+ years of test-prep experience, he is repeatedly described as engaging, patient and good at making a nervous student feel math is learnable. His stated philosophy — "it's not difficult, you just don't know it yet" — shows up in the teaching, and the free 1-hour Skype session he offers is a rare personal touch at this price.

Value for money4.0 / 5

List price is around $70 but the course is almost always on sale in the $10-20 band with lifetime access, plus a free formula-sheet PDF and a bonus Skype session — genuinely cheap versus Magoosh, Manhattan or Target Test Prep. The honest deduction is that you are required to buy Barron's 6 GRE Practice Tests separately to actually use the videos, so the true out-of-pocket cost is higher than the headline, and independent reviewers note Barron's is not the best-regarded practice source.

Practice material2.8 / 5

The weakest dimension by a wide margin and the one every critical source agrees on. The course contains no independent practice questions, no quizzes and no full-length tests — it is built entirely around explaining problems from an external Barron's book you must purchase yourself. BrightLink Prep is blunt that "there are no practice exercises crucial to forming a solid understanding," and points out Barron's is a questionable choice versus official ETS material.

Score improvement3.9 / 5

Learners credit the method with building confidence and giving them concrete strategies for question types they previously froze on, and the topic-by-topic mastery approach maps well onto how GRE quant is structured. But because the course supplies no practice and no full-length mocks, score movement depends entirely on the learner doing the external Barron's (and ideally official ETS) practice on top — the videos teach the how, not the timed reps.

Content quality4.1 / 5

Magoosh provides 290+ video lessons covering Quantitative, Verbal, and Analytical Writing, plus 1,600+ practice questions — 160 of which are licensed official ETS problems, making Magoosh the only US GRE prep company with access to these materials. Independent reviewers at Test Prep Insight confirm the practice problems are "a close match for the real GRE" and that it would be "hard to decipher real GRE problems from most of Magoosh's mock problems." The main content criticism is that hard-level Magoosh quant questions can exceed actual GRE difficulty, and the curriculum occasionally presents problems before the relevant concepts have been fully taught in the video lessons.

Instructor4.2 / 5

Tutors Chris Lele and Mike McGarry — the primary Magoosh GRE instructors — are recognized as experienced GRE educators who know their material deeply and present it clearly. GRE tutor Vince Kotchian (15+ years experience) specifically called them out as experienced teachers with strong instructional abilities. The consistent criticism is the delivery format: PowerPoint-style slides with voiceover rather than an instructor on camera, which multiple reviewers describe as "not the most engaging" and less polished than Kaplan's dynamic whiteboard format.

Value for money4.6 / 5

At $149 for one month or $179 for six months, Magoosh is consistently described as an "absolute steal" and "bang for the buck" by independent reviewers — especially compared to Kaplan ($599), Manhattan Prep ($599+), and Princeton Review ($449+). The +5 point score guarantee with a full refund option (verified by actual users who received refunds) and a 7-day no-questions-asked return window add additional low-risk appeal. Test Prep Insight calls the pricing "an absolute steal," and EduReviewer assigns value-for-money a 4.5/5 score. The Live Classes add-on at $499 is seen as significantly less attractive value.

Practice material4.0 / 5

Magoosh provides 24/7 email support from GRE tutors, with response times reported consistently within 24 hours and often faster. Top Consumer Reviews (June 2026) notes customers report "getting feedback on their questions super fast and the responses are super helpful." The platform also includes in-app contextual help, score predictor tools, and links from each question to relevant lesson videos. The limitation is the absence of live chat or phone support — communication is email-only — and no private tutoring is bundled in the standard plan. Live class sessions (extra cost) add real-time interaction but are excluded from the core subscription.

Score improvement4.0 / 5

Magoosh reports an average student score increase of 5–6 points and a 5-point improvement guarantee. Verified reviews on gre.magoosh.com show students reaching scores of 322–335, with one student improving from 310 (157Q/153V) to 324 (165Q/159V). EduReviewer notes that 20% of Magoosh users score in the top 10%. GRE tutor Vince Kotchian's honest caveat is that Magoosh "is best for students in the middle who want structure and are okay with a score below 320" — those targeting 165+ per section may find the question difficulty ceiling insufficient for their goals, particularly on the quantitative side.

Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.