GRE Math Prep Course: The A–Z on GRE Math Topic by Topic vs Comprehensive GMAT Prep: Self-Study Guide to GMAT 700+

The course is a tightly-organised library of 240 worked GRE quant solutions across ~13 hours, taught topic by topic from the absolute basics up through harder material like probability. Reviewers consistently praise the clear, step-by-step breakdowns and the memorable mnemonic devices (the "Beyonce Rule" is the one people quote back). The recurring content caveat is that it is purely solution walkthroughs — there are no embedded original practice questions, so the "content" is teaching, not testing.

Olu Sanya is the strongest part of the package. A Morehouse/Georgia Tech Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering graduate with 14+ years of test-prep experience, he is repeatedly described as engaging, patient and good at making a nervous student feel math is learnable. His stated philosophy — "it's not difficult, you just don't know it yet" — shows up in the teaching, and the free 1-hour Skype session he offers is a rare personal touch at this price.

List price is around $70 but the course is almost always on sale in the $10-20 band with lifetime access, plus a free formula-sheet PDF and a bonus Skype session — genuinely cheap versus Magoosh, Manhattan or Target Test Prep. The honest deduction is that you are required to buy Barron's 6 GRE Practice Tests separately to actually use the videos, so the true out-of-pocket cost is higher than the headline, and independent reviewers note Barron's is not the best-regarded practice source.

The weakest dimension by a wide margin and the one every critical source agrees on. The course contains no independent practice questions, no quizzes and no full-length tests — it is built entirely around explaining problems from an external Barron's book you must purchase yourself. BrightLink Prep is blunt that "there are no practice exercises crucial to forming a solid understanding," and points out Barron's is a questionable choice versus official ETS material.

Learners credit the method with building confidence and giving them concrete strategies for question types they previously froze on, and the topic-by-topic mastery approach maps well onto how GRE quant is structured. But because the course supplies no practice and no full-length mocks, score movement depends entirely on the learner doing the external Barron's (and ideally official ETS) practice on top — the videos teach the how, not the timed reps.

The course is positioned as a consolidated self-study strategy guide rather than a full content syllabus: it teaches how to plan a GMAT preparation, how to attempt questions, and how to track progress, rather than re-teaching every quant and verbal concept from scratch. Reviewers describe it as covering "all important aspects of the GMAT exam in an easy to comprehend manner," and the standout asset is a specially designed MS-Excel GMAT Analysis Tool plus consolidated revision notes. The honest limit is breadth — it is a strategy and planning layer, not a comprehensive concept course, so a true beginner will need separate material to actually learn the maths and grammar.

The instructor's credibility rests on a concrete, verifiable claim: a GMAT 740 (Q50, V40) on the first attempt achieved through self-study. That is a strong, top-percentile result and it gives the strategy advice real weight, because the whole course is essentially "here is exactly what I did." The teaching philosophy — "if I was able to crack the GMAT through self-study, anyone can" — is encouraging and the test-day strategy insights are the part learners single out as genuinely useful. The deduction is transparency: the instructor's full name and broader teaching track record are not prominently published, so you are trusting one person's score story rather than an established prep brand.

This is the course's strongest dimension. It is explicitly priced "at the lowest possible price" and is regularly available very cheaply or via free coupons, with lifetime access and Udemy's 30-day refund. For the cost of a single coffee you get a structured self-study roadmap, an Excel tracking tool and revision notes from a 740 scorer — a tiny fraction of what Target Test Prep, Manhattan Prep or e-GMAT charge. The fair caveat is that the low price reflects scope: you are buying a plan and tools, not thousands of practice questions, so the real cost of your prep is this plus the official GMAT material you still need to buy.

The weakest area and the one most likely to disappoint buyers who expect a question bank. The course includes some solved questions to illustrate the attempting strategy, but it is not a high-volume practice resource — there are no full-length adaptive mocks and no large bank of original problems. Its own design assumes you will do your heavy practice in the Official Guide and GMAT Official Practice Exams; the course's job is to tell you how to use them efficiently and track your weak areas with the Excel tool, not to be your practice source.

The realistic value proposition is structure and efficiency rather than a guaranteed point jump. Learners credit the test-day strategy and the self-analysis tool with helping them prepare smarter, and the 740-scorer framing maps the plan onto a genuinely high outcome. But because the course supplies little practice and no full mocks, any score gain depends almost entirely on the learner pairing it with official material and doing the timed reps — the course is the map, not the miles.