GRE Math Prep Course: The A–Z on GRE Math Topic by Topic vs Nova's LSAT Prep Course

The course is a tightly-organised library of 240 worked GRE quant solutions across ~13 hours, taught topic by topic from the absolute basics up through harder material like probability. Reviewers consistently praise the clear, step-by-step breakdowns and the memorable mnemonic devices (the "Beyonce Rule" is the one people quote back). The recurring content caveat is that it is purely solution walkthroughs — there are no embedded original practice questions, so the "content" is teaching, not testing.

Olu Sanya is the strongest part of the package. A Morehouse/Georgia Tech Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering graduate with 14+ years of test-prep experience, he is repeatedly described as engaging, patient and good at making a nervous student feel math is learnable. His stated philosophy — "it's not difficult, you just don't know it yet" — shows up in the teaching, and the free 1-hour Skype session he offers is a rare personal touch at this price.

List price is around $70 but the course is almost always on sale in the $10-20 band with lifetime access, plus a free formula-sheet PDF and a bonus Skype session — genuinely cheap versus Magoosh, Manhattan or Target Test Prep. The honest deduction is that you are required to buy Barron's 6 GRE Practice Tests separately to actually use the videos, so the true out-of-pocket cost is higher than the headline, and independent reviewers note Barron's is not the best-regarded practice source.

The weakest dimension by a wide margin and the one every critical source agrees on. The course contains no independent practice questions, no quizzes and no full-length tests — it is built entirely around explaining problems from an external Barron's book you must purchase yourself. BrightLink Prep is blunt that "there are no practice exercises crucial to forming a solid understanding," and points out Barron's is a questionable choice versus official ETS material.

Learners credit the method with building confidence and giving them concrete strategies for question types they previously froze on, and the topic-by-topic mastery approach maps well onto how GRE quant is structured. But because the course supplies no practice and no full-length mocks, score movement depends entirely on the learner doing the external Barron's (and ideally official ETS) practice on top — the videos teach the how, not the timed reps.

The course delivers 403 lectures across 8.5 hours, working through fundamental logic principles — contrapositives, if-then chains, pivotal words — drawn from Nova Press's 560-page Master The LSAT book. Amazon reviews of the underlying book highlight thorough coverage of analytical reasoning and a clear step-by-step breakdown of argument structure. The critical content issue that every independent reviewer and community discussion now flags is currency: Logic Games (the Analytical Reasoning section) were permanently removed from the LSAT beginning August 2024, and any course built substantially around that section is teaching material no longer on the test. The Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension coverage is more durable, but the absence of an explicit update addressing the format change is a real gap.

Jeff Kolby of Nova Press carries genuine credentials — 20+ years in test preparation, millions of students reached through Nova's print materials, and a bestselling Amazon ranking for the Master The LSAT book. Amazon book reviewers describe the Nova approach as highly analytical and structured, with solid foundations for argument deconstruction. The honest deduction is that Kolby is primarily known as a publisher and author rather than an on-screen LSAT video instructor, and with only 187 Udemy enrolments the teaching format has had limited real-world stress-testing relative to competitors like 7Sage or Blueprint. Community discussions on Reddit do not mention him by name in the way that Blueprint or LSAT Demon instructors are cited.

This is where the course is hardest to argue against. At a typical sale price of $12-20 with lifetime access, it provides the equivalent of a two-month course framework for roughly the cost of a textbook — compared to $699-$1,899 for Blueprint, Princeton Review, or Kaplan. The onlinecoursespro.com review gives it 4.2/5 overall and cites the 30-day money-back guarantee, free course updates, and iOS/Android access as genuine extras at the price. The honest caveat is that the low price also reflects a small enrolled community (187 students) and a curriculum that has not been explicitly updated for the post-August 2024 LSAT format, which is a meaningful real cost in wasted study time if you are sitting the current exam.

The course is built around teaching logic principles through the Nova Press curriculum, not around supplying high-volume practice. There are no embedded full-length LSAT practice tests and no original question bank; Reddit's r/LSAT community consistently warns that effective LSAT prep requires drilling with official LSAC questions from LawHub, and no Udemy course can replicate that. Independent community reviewers note that the most cost-effective practice resource is free — Khan Academy's official LSAC-partnered prep — which raises the bar for what a paid course must add. The practice-materials gap here is the widest of the five criteria.

Nova Press's own marketing claims "your score will improve significantly" if you master the course material, and Amazon reviews of the underlying book include anecdotes of successful law school admission after following the study plan. Community opinion gathered from LSAT forums and Reddit threads is more measured: structured prep courses are broadly credited with 10-15 point improvements versus unguided self-study, but reviewers consistently note those gains require pairing any video course with heavy LawHub official practice. At a competitive level, LSAT Demon, 7Sage, and Blueprint are the platforms cited when score improvement is the primary goal.