PTE Academic All Modules (A-Z Course) Score 90 EACH vs CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Complete Course & Practice Exam
Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.
Udemy · Test Prep
PTE Academic All Modules (A-Z Course) Score 90 EACH
Udemy · Test Prep
CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Complete Course & Practice Exam
Per-criterion
PTE Academic All Modules (A-Z Course) Score 90 EACH
The course covers all four PTE Academic sections comprehensively: Speaking & Writing (Describe Image, Re-Tell Lecture, Summarise Written Text, Write Essay, Respond to a Situation), Reading (Fill in the Blanks, Multiple Choice, Re-order Paragraphs, Reading & Writing Fill in the Blanks), and Listening (Summarise Spoken Text, Multiple Choice, Fill in the Blanks, Highlight Correct Summary, Select Missing Word, Highlight Incorrect Words, Write from Dictation). This A-to-Z structure ensures no test section is neglected — a common gap in narrower PTE prep resources that focus exclusively on speaking or writing. The content is specifically calibrated for the AI-scoring engine that Pearson uses to mark PTE responses — a critical differentiator from IELTS or TOEFL prep, where human examiners apply subjective judgment. PTE instructors who regularly take the real exam incorporate up-to-date knowledge of which strategies the AI rewards consistently, including template structures for describe-image tasks and timing strategies for the sequential reading module. Courses on Udemy that were updated for the 2025 PTE pattern changes reflect the most current scoring algorithm behaviour. The course's weakness is in volume of practice material: while strategies are clearly explained, some learners find the number of practice questions insufficient and supplement with third-party mock test resources to build exam stamina. High-scoring PTE preparation typically requires 200+ practice items across all modules to internalise timing and strategy under exam conditions.
The most trusted PTE instructors on Udemy are those who have personally achieved high scores — typically 79+ or 90/90 — on recent real PTE exams. This matters in a way that other certification courses do not: because PTE is AI-scored, the strategies that reliably produce high marks evolve with Pearson's algorithm updates, and instructors who sit the real exam periodically can validate their approaches against live test conditions rather than assumptions. Instructors in this category bring a critical insight that distinguishes PTE preparation from general English teaching: the AI scoring system rewards consistency, template adherence, and specific fluency markers differently from human examiners, and knowing these patterns precisely is more valuable than general language proficiency coaching. Learners consistently credit this insider knowledge for score improvements that general English courses could not have produced. Multiple instructors across the PTE category on Udemy report audiences of 10,000–30,000+ students with YouTube channels providing supplementary free content, reinforcing their authority and responsiveness to learner questions. The limitation is that instructor quality across the PTE Udemy category varies considerably. Some courses lack evidence of recent personal test experience, defaulting to general English teaching principles that do not translate reliably to the AI-scored PTE context.
Udemy's flash sale pricing — which brings most courses to $10–$20 from list prices of $89–$129 — makes comprehensive PTE preparation dramatically more accessible than dedicated PTE prep centres, which charge $200–$500 for equivalent instruction in classroom or small group settings. The Udemy pricing model also includes lifetime access to all course materials and updates, meaning learners who attempt PTE more than once retain access to the full strategy library without additional cost. For the PTE Academic specifically — a test where the required score threshold can be the difference between immigration approval and rejection — the investment in a structured preparation course is well justified. A $15 Udemy course that consistently produces +10 score improvements has a cost-benefit ratio that no alternative preparation method approaches. Udemy's 30-day money-back guarantee removes financial risk from the purchase decision, and the platform's mobile apps allow learners to review strategy lectures during commutes and off-hours without requiring a desk. Learners who supplement the course with official Pearson practice tests (available separately from pearsonpte.com) have access to the most realistic mock test experience at a total cost still well below classroom prep.
PTE strategy courses on Udemy vary in practice material depth. The strongest offerings include 200+ practice questions distributed across all four test modules, 30+ full mock tests, and supplementary audio recordings for Speaking tasks. This level of material provision equips learners with sufficient exposure to the question types and time pressure dynamics they will encounter in the real three-hour test. However, learners targeting 79+ scores — the threshold commonly required for Australian PR under the General Skilled Migration pathway — consistently note that Udemy courses alone are insufficient for mock test volume. The Pearson PTE preparation platform and official scored practice tests from pearsonpte.com provide AI-scored feedback on Speaking and Writing responses that Udemy video instruction cannot replicate. The most effective preparation strategy combines Udemy's strategy instruction with official Pearson scored mock tests for final exam simulation. Courses that include audio and video walkthroughs of template responses for key question types (Describe Image, Re-Tell Lecture) provide the most actionable practice material and are consistently rated higher by students in head-to-head comparisons within the PTE Udemy category.
Learner-reported score improvement data from PTE preparation courses on Udemy is consistently positive. Students who combine systematic strategy application with adequate mock test practice typically report score gains of 10–15 points on individual modules, with some learners achieving jumps from the 50s to the 79+ threshold required for immigration purposes in a single preparation cycle. The AI-scored nature of PTE is a meaningful factor here: unlike IELTS, where human examiner variation introduces unpredictability, PTE AI scoring responds consistently to specific patterns. Template structures for Describe Image and Re-Tell Lecture tasks that the AI reliably rewards — when learned correctly and practiced to fluency — produce more predictable score improvement than general communication coaching. Instructors who have personally achieved 90/90 demonstrate that the ceiling is reachable through systematic preparation rather than innate language ability. The caveat is that score improvement is highly variable by starting point. Test takers already in the 70s who need 79+ for immigration are in the most critical zone, and achieving that final threshold requires particularly precise strategy application and mock test volume beyond what most Udemy courses alone can provide.
CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Complete Course & Practice Exam
The course covers all five SY0-701 exam domains across 264 modules and 31 hours of video, spanning General Security Concepts, Threats and Vulnerabilities, Security Architecture, Security Operations, and Security Program Management. Reviewers on OpenCourser and Reddemy consistently praise the structured domain breakdown, acronym walkthroughs, and the alignment with official CompTIA exam objectives. The main content gap flagged by multiple learners is limited hands-on lab simulation — the course is predominantly lecture-based, which can make performance-based question (PBQ) preparation less thorough than the actual exam requires.
Jason Dion brings over 20 years of IT and cybersecurity experience to the course and is consistently described by reviewers as easy to follow, thorough, and amiable. OpenCourser reviewers Victor Cabrales and Mark Guillen both called out his clear explanations and acronym-focused teaching style as the course's standout feature. He holds CompTIA Platinum Partner status, and Dion Training's 4.6+ star network-wide rating across 2 million+ students reinforces his reputation as one of the most reliable certification prep instructors in the field.
The course is almost always available on Udemy for $13–$20 during the platform's frequent sales, a price point that Reddemy commenters repeatedly highlight as exceptional for 31 hours of content plus practice materials. One Reddemy user noted purchasing both the course and the separate practice exam set for approximately $13 each during a sale. At that price, Dion's course delivers one of the lowest cost-per-hour ratios of any paid Security+ preparation resource, with lifetime access and periodic content updates included.
Multiple reviewers who passed SY0-701 on their first attempt credit Dion's course as their primary preparation resource, including John T. (Medium), who passed in under two months with no prior cybersecurity background. The course's exam-focused framing maps tightly to Security+'s five domains and the career skills they represent — threat analysis, security architecture, and incident response. However, the lecture-only format and absence of hands-on labs mean learners entering cybersecurity roles will need additional practical experience beyond what the course alone provides.
Like most Udemy courses, learner support is limited to the platform's Q&A section — there is no live instructor interaction or direct email support. One Reddemy user flagged a structural navigation issue, noting difficulty jumping directly to specific domains without watching the course sequentially. Response times in the Q&A section are generally adequate for a high-enrollment course, but learners who need real-time feedback or personalized guidance will need to seek supplementary communities such as the r/CompTIA subreddit.
Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.