GRE Complete Prep: How to Score 330+ for Top Grad Schools vs Nova's LSAT Prep Course
Same Bayesian formula, same rubric — so the difference in scores reflects the difference in the courses, not the difference in how we evaluated them.
Dr. Gerald Richardson / Subeezy (Udemy) · Test Prep
GRE Complete Prep: How to Score 330+ for Top Grad Schools
Nova Press / Jeff Kolby (Udemy) · Test Prep
Nova's LSAT Prep Course
Per-criterion
The course covers all three GRE sections — Quantitative Reasoning, Verbal Reasoning, and Analytical Writing — across 27+ hours of on-demand video, with 400+ practice questions and downloadable resources. Reviewers describe the content as systematically structured, building from foundational concepts (fractions, exponents, roots) up through advanced topics. The 2024 update added 30+ new videos reflecting GRE format revisions. The main limitation noted by critics is that content is almost entirely video-based with no dedicated offline summary PDFs and some missing quiz answer options.
Dr. Gerald Day Richardson holds both an MD and an EdM from Harvard and personally aced the GRE. Students consistently praise his calm, clear teaching voice and ability to demystify difficult concepts. Testimonials describe him as "thorough, covering so many concepts in great detail" with a "soothing instructor voice." His approach — building from absolute basics without assuming prior knowledge — is singled out repeatedly as what sets this course apart from others.
The list price sits around $84-99, but the course is almost always on Udemy sale between $15-25, with lifetime access and a 30-day money-back guarantee. At sale price, 27+ hours covering all three GRE sections with 400+ practice questions represents strong value versus Magoosh ($149+/year) or Manhattan Prep ($249+). Independent reviewers confirm Udemy GRE courses offer "incredible bang for your buck" at their typical sale price. The trade-off is that — unlike premium platforms — this course lacks full-length adaptive mock tests and vocabulary tools.
The course includes an active Q&A forum, and student reviews note the instructor responds to doubts — one reviewer specifically praised that "the tutor goes an extra mile to reply quickly to your doubts." However, support is limited to the Udemy Q&A system; there is no live tutoring, community forum outside the platform, or direct messaging. For a self-paced $15-25 course this is reasonable, but learners needing real-time feedback should consider supplementing with a dedicated GRE community like r/GRE or GregMat's Discord.
Multiple verified students report meaningful score improvements after completing the course. One student credits it with helping her "gain admission to my dream graduate program," and another says he "finally beat the 160 barrier." A non-native English speaker reports scoring "so much higher on the real exam" after completing the verbal and writing sections. The caveat from independent analysis is that the course works best as part of a broader study plan supplemented by official ETS PowerPrep practice tests — the teaching is strong, but the course alone may not be sufficient for students targeting 330+ without additional timed practice.
The course delivers 403 lectures across 8.5 hours, working through fundamental logic principles — contrapositives, if-then chains, pivotal words — drawn from Nova Press's 560-page Master The LSAT book. Amazon reviews of the underlying book highlight thorough coverage of analytical reasoning and a clear step-by-step breakdown of argument structure. The critical content issue that every independent reviewer and community discussion now flags is currency: Logic Games (the Analytical Reasoning section) were permanently removed from the LSAT beginning August 2024, and any course built substantially around that section is teaching material no longer on the test. The Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension coverage is more durable, but the absence of an explicit update addressing the format change is a real gap.
Jeff Kolby of Nova Press carries genuine credentials — 20+ years in test preparation, millions of students reached through Nova's print materials, and a bestselling Amazon ranking for the Master The LSAT book. Amazon book reviewers describe the Nova approach as highly analytical and structured, with solid foundations for argument deconstruction. The honest deduction is that Kolby is primarily known as a publisher and author rather than an on-screen LSAT video instructor, and with only 187 Udemy enrolments the teaching format has had limited real-world stress-testing relative to competitors like 7Sage or Blueprint. Community discussions on Reddit do not mention him by name in the way that Blueprint or LSAT Demon instructors are cited.
This is where the course is hardest to argue against. At a typical sale price of $12-20 with lifetime access, it provides the equivalent of a two-month course framework for roughly the cost of a textbook — compared to $699-$1,899 for Blueprint, Princeton Review, or Kaplan. The onlinecoursespro.com review gives it 4.2/5 overall and cites the 30-day money-back guarantee, free course updates, and iOS/Android access as genuine extras at the price. The honest caveat is that the low price also reflects a small enrolled community (187 students) and a curriculum that has not been explicitly updated for the post-August 2024 LSAT format, which is a meaningful real cost in wasted study time if you are sitting the current exam.
The course is built around teaching logic principles through the Nova Press curriculum, not around supplying high-volume practice. There are no embedded full-length LSAT practice tests and no original question bank; Reddit's r/LSAT community consistently warns that effective LSAT prep requires drilling with official LSAC questions from LawHub, and no Udemy course can replicate that. Independent community reviewers note that the most cost-effective practice resource is free — Khan Academy's official LSAC-partnered prep — which raises the bar for what a paid course must add. The practice-materials gap here is the widest of the five criteria.
Nova Press's own marketing claims "your score will improve significantly" if you master the course material, and Amazon reviews of the underlying book include anecdotes of successful law school admission after following the study plan. Community opinion gathered from LSAT forums and Reddit threads is more measured: structured prep courses are broadly credited with 10-15 point improvements versus unguided self-study, but reviewers consistently note those gains require pairing any video course with heavy LawHub official practice. At a competitive level, LSAT Demon, 7Sage, and Blueprint are the platforms cited when score improvement is the primary goal.
Scoring methodology applies identically to every course on the site — see the formula.